qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>,
	thuth@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
	 richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, jrossi@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, iii@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 2
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:56:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2db58bdb-d9a2-4d58-a721-b31774a295d9@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce1bc819-59c3-4707-ab18-4853eee990d6@linux.ibm.com>

On 7/29/25 14:18, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback!
> 
> On 7/28/25 4:59 PM, Collin Walling wrote:
>> On 7/11/25 17:10, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
> 
> ...
> 

[...]

>>
>> You need a check somewhere for no certs found in either the specified
>> range or no certs exist in the store at all:
>>  - VCB output len = 64
>>  - stored and remaining count = 0
>>  - response code 0x0001
>>
>>> +    if (in_len % TARGET_PAGE_SIZE != 0) {
>>> +        return DIAG_320_RC_INVAL_VCB_LEN;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (first_vc_index > last_vc_index) {
>>> +        return DIAG_320_RC_BAD_RANGE;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (first_vc_index == 0) {
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * Zero is a valid index for the first and last VC index.
>>> +         * Zero index results in the VCB header and zero certificates returned.
>>> +         */
>>> +        if (last_vc_index == 0) {
>>> +            goto out;
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>> +        /* DIAG320 certificate store remains a one origin for cert entries */
>>> +        vcb->first_vc_index = 1;
>>> +        first_vc_index = 1;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    vce_offset = VCB_HEADER_LEN;
>>> +    vcb->out_len = VCB_HEADER_LEN;
>>> +    remaining_space = in_len - VCB_HEADER_LEN;
>>> +
> 
> Re: check for no certs found in either the specified range or no certs
> exist.
> 
> This case is already handled.
> 
> vcb->out_len = VCB_HEADER_LEN is set outside the for loop. If the index
> is invalid, the loop won’t execute, and both the stored and remaining VC
> counts remain unchanged at 0.
> 
>>> +    for (int i = first_vc_index - 1; i < last_vc_index && i < qcs->count; i++) {
>>> +        VCEntry *vce;
>>> +        S390IPLCertificate qcert = qcs->certs[i];
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * Each VCE is word aligned.
>>> +         * Each variable length field within the VCE is also word aligned.
>>> +         */
>>> +        keyid_buf_size = ROUND_UP(qcert.key_id_size, 4);
>>> +        hash_buf_size = ROUND_UP(qcert.hash_size, 4);
>>> +        cert_buf_size = ROUND_UP(qcert.der_size, 4);
>>> +        vce_len = VCE_HEADER_LEN + cert_buf_size + keyid_buf_size + hash_buf_size;
>>
>> You could define & set the above four lines inside build_vce (or as
>> respective fields in the helper functions mentioned above).
>>
>> The remaining space check could be done after the vce has been built.
>>
>>> +
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * If there is no more space to store the cert,
>>> +         * set the remaining verification cert count and
>>> +         * break early.
>>> +         */
>>> +        if (remaining_space < vce_len) {
>>> +            vcb->remain_ct = cpu_to_be16(last_vc_index - i);
>>> +            break;
>>> +        }
>>
>> You also need to check somewhere if there is enough space to store *at
>> least* the first cert in the range:
>>  - VCB output len = 64
>>  - stored count = 0
>>  - remaining count = // however are remaining
>>  - response code 0x0001
>>
> 
> This case is also covered by the if statement above:
> 
> 	if (remaining_space < vce_len) {
>             vcb->remain_ct = cpu_to_be16(last_vc_index - i);
>             break;
>         }
> 
> Response code 0x0001 is returned at the end of the function for both cases.
> 

Sorry, I neglected to mentally trace some different loop variables to
see that these cases are indeed handled.  Thanks for clarifying!

[...]

-- 
Regards,
  Collin


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-29 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 21:10 [PATCH v4 00/28] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 01/28] Add boot-certificates to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 15:56   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:06   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 03/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:14   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 04/28] s390x: Guest support for Certificate Store Facility (CS) Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-21 21:30   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-23 20:15     ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 05/28] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for certificate store facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-21 21:26   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-21 21:39     ` Collin Walling
2025-07-22 21:08       ` Collin Walling
2025-07-23 17:50     ` Eric Farman
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 06/28] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 07/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-23 20:17   ` Eric Farman
2025-07-28 22:01     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-23 22:15   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-23 22:20     ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 08/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:20   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/28] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:23   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-28 20:59   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-29 18:18     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-29 18:56       ` Collin Walling [this message]
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/28] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/28] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:26   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 12/28] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 13/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 14/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 15/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 16/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Set iplb->len to maximum length of " Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 17/28] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 20:33   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 18/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 20:53   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 19/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 22:10   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-15 15:59     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-15 21:48       ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 20/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 22:50   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-14 14:54     ` Jared Rossi
2025-07-14 15:34       ` Thomas Huth
2025-07-14 17:46         ` Collin Walling
2025-07-21 21:50     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-28 21:05       ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 21/28] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-14 22:13   ` Collin Walling
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 22/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 23/28] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 24/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 25/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 26/28] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-22 16:28   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 27/28] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-11 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 28/28] docs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2025-07-21 19:13   ` Collin Walling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2db58bdb-d9a2-4d58-a721-b31774a295d9@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).