From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: "Lukas Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spapr: Migrate CAS reboot flag
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:37:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda458a-dfa1-ab23-4a97-d27d9266226b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116094848.555c170d@bahia.lan>
On 16/01/2020 09:48, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:10:37 +0100
> Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15/01/2020 18:48, Greg Kurz wrote:
>>> Migration can potentially race with CAS reboot. If the migration thread
>>> completes migration after CAS has set spapr->cas_reboot but before the
>>> mainloop could pick up the reset request and reset the machine, the
>>> guest is migrated unrebooted and the destination doesn't reboot it
>>> either because it isn't aware a CAS reboot was needed (eg, because a
>>> device was added before CAS). This likely result in a broken or hung
>>> guest.
>>>
>>> Even if it is small, the window between CAS and CAS reboot is enough to
>>> re-qualify spapr->cas_reboot as state that we should migrate. Add a new
>>> subsection for that and always send it when a CAS reboot is pending.
>>> This may cause migration to older QEMUs to fail but it is still better
>>> than end up with a broken guest.
>>>
>>> The destination cannot honour the CAS reboot request from a post load
>>> handler because this must be done after the guest is fully restored.
>>> It is thus done from a VM change state handler.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>> I'm wondering if the problem can be related with the fact that
>> main_loop_should_exit() could release qemu_global_mutex in
>> pause_all_vcpus() in the reset case?
>>
>> 1602 static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
>> 1603 {
>> ...
>> 1633 request = qemu_reset_requested();
>> 1634 if (request) {
>> 1635 pause_all_vcpus();
>> 1636 qemu_system_reset(request);
>> 1637 resume_all_vcpus();
>> 1638 if (!runstate_check(RUN_STATE_RUNNING) &&
>> 1639 !runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) {
>> 1640 runstate_set(RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH);
>> 1641 }
>> 1642 }
>> ...
>>
>> I already sent a patch for this kind of problem (in current Juan pull
>> request):
>>
>> "runstate: ignore finishmigrate -> prelaunch transition"
>>
>
> IIUC your patch avoids an invalid 'prelaunch' -> 'postmigrate' runstate
> transition that can happen if the migration thread sets the runstate to
> 'finishmigrate' when pause_all_vcpus() releases the main loop mutex.
>
> ie. symptom of the problem is QEMU aborting, correct ? The issue I'm
> trying to fix is a guest breakage caused by a discrepancy between
> QEMU and the guest after migration has succeeded.
>
>> but I don't know if it could fix this one.
>>
>
> I don't think so and your patch kinda illustrates it. If the runstate
> is 'finishmigrate' when returning from pause_all_vcpus(), this means
> that state was sent to the destination before we could actually reset
> the machine.
Yes, you're right.
But the question behind my comment was: is it expected to have a pending
reset while we are migrating?
Perhaps H_CAS can return H_BUSY and wait the end of the migration and
then be fully executed on destination?
Thanks,
Laurent
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-16 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 17:48 [PATCH] spapr: Migrate CAS reboot flag Greg Kurz
2020-01-15 18:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-01-15 18:26 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-01-17 11:49 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-17 12:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-01-17 15:49 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-16 8:48 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-16 10:37 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2020-01-16 12:14 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-16 18:29 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-17 9:16 ` David Gibson
2020-01-17 15:44 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-20 8:04 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-21 3:43 ` David Gibson
2020-01-21 9:32 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-22 6:50 ` David Gibson
2020-01-22 10:06 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-23 5:08 ` David Gibson
2020-01-15 18:10 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-21 3:41 ` David Gibson
2020-01-21 6:57 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-01-21 7:38 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-22 12:47 ` Greg Kurz
2020-01-22 14:08 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2dda458a-dfa1-ab23-4a97-d27d9266226b@redhat.com \
--to=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).