From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] memory: Drop FlatRange.romd_mode
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 21:25:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e36ab08-5ea8-f7f9-64d2-bb1c7e4d3503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc530331-4abe-1161-a559-73ce6e10b532@redhat.com>
On 24/05/2016 19:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Which I think satisfies (a->mr == b->mr), but falsifies (a->romd_mode
> == b->romd_mode).
>
> In effect, the patch seems to allow merging and equality between
> FlatRange objects when they only differ in romd_mode, and that's
> wrong.
>
> Given that the cover letter for this series says "memory: Dead code
> removals", I'm requesting that this patch be simply reverted.
>
> Drew and myself bisected this independently, in parallel. The bug was
> originally reported by Drew, so I think on the revert commit, the
> Reported-by should belong to him. Beyond the bisection, Drew also
> tested the exact revert, and it restores functionality. For which
> reason, I'm proposing, for the revert patch:
>
> Reported-by: Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>
> If my analysis above is correct, then I wouldn't mind taking credit
> for it, something like:
>
> Analyzed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
That makes a lot of sense. Revert on the way.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-24 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 10:10 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] memory: Dead code removals Fam Zheng
2016-03-25 10:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] memory: Remove code for mr->may_overlap Fam Zheng
2016-03-29 16:14 ` Peter Maydell
2016-03-25 10:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] memory: Drop FlatRange.romd_mode Fam Zheng
2016-05-24 17:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-05-24 19:25 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-05-25 1:29 ` Fam Zheng
2016-03-25 11:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] memory: Dead code removals Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e36ab08-5ea8-f7f9-64d2-bb1c7e4d3503@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).