From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH95C-0006Mr-5G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:03:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH958-0000vr-8r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:03:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:53700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH956-0000qB-9q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:03:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id l26-v6so8582785wmh.3 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:03:44 -0700 (PDT) References: <1540548409-22560-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <7fc49925-36ff-bd9a-0cd7-e5f8d4bb3672@roeck-us.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <2eb2b4ef-725d-cbee-1676-feb6bd800aea@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:03:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Deprecate the "collie" machine and Strongarm devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Guenter Roeck , Peter Maydell Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-arm , QEMU Developers , Markus Armbruster Hi Guenter, On 29/10/18 15:09, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/29/18 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 27 October 2018 at 12:04, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 10/26/18 3:12 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> Hi Guenter; there's a proposal here to deprecate (and eventually >>>> remove) the 'collie' board (strongarm) from QEMU. Is that one of >>>> the ones you're currently using in your automated testing of Linux >>>> kernels on QEMU? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. I can run the test with older versions of qemu, so it is ok for me >>> if it is removed (as long as that removal is not backported). >> >> Mmm, but if we have an active user who's testing them then they >> probably shouldn't be in the frontline of boards to remove. >> Which other boards do you test with mainline QEMU? >> > > For arm: > > akita > ast2500-evb > beagle > beaglexm > borzoi > collie > cubieboard > imx25-pdk > integratorcp > kzm > mainstone > midway > mps2-an385 > overo > palmetto-bmc > raspi2 > realview-eb > realview-eb-mpcore > realview-pb-a8 > realview-pbx-a9 > romulus-bmc > sabrelite > smdkc210 > spitz > terrier > tosa > versatileab > versatilepb > vexpress-a15 > vexpress-a15-a7 > vexpress-a9 > witherspoon-bmc > xilinx-zynq-a9 > z2 > > Though not all of them are supported by upstream qemu. For some of them > I carry local patches, > for others I use out-of-tree versions of qemu (beagle/beaglexm). Are these patches upstream-able? If not, what do we need to get them into upstream qemu? Thanks, Phil.