From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRdck-0002T8-Dm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:42:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRdcj-0007u4-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:41:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com ([209.85.128.65]:52059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRdci-0007tn-Rh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:41:56 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j207so14795281wmj.1 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 05:41:56 -0800 (PST) References: <154332389387.541746.8099441653585015043.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> <154332392916.541746.3772338098005086592.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <2ed1d297-abd8-8d33-fb9a-f89e2bfb3cff@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:41:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <154332392916.541746.3772338098005086592.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 3/9] ppc405_boards: use g_new(T, n) instead of g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Greg Kurz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Gibson On 27/11/18 14:05, Greg Kurz wrote: > Because it is a recommended coding practice (see HACKING). > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz > --- > hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c b/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c > index 3be3fe4432b4..f35b412c88dd 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static void ref405ep_init(MachineState *machine) > MemoryRegion *bios; > MemoryRegion *sram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); > ram_addr_t bdloc; > - MemoryRegion *ram_memories = g_malloc(2 * sizeof(*ram_memories)); > + MemoryRegion *ram_memories = g_new(MemoryRegion, 2); > hwaddr ram_bases[2], ram_sizes[2]; > target_ulong sram_size; > long bios_size; > @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static void taihu_405ep_init(MachineState *machine) > qemu_irq *pic; > MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory(); > MemoryRegion *bios; > - MemoryRegion *ram_memories = g_malloc(2 * sizeof(*ram_memories)); > + MemoryRegion *ram_memories = g_new(MemoryRegion, 2); > MemoryRegion *ram = g_malloc0(sizeof(*ram)); Why not change both lines here? MemoryRegion *ram = g_new0(MemoryRegion, 1); > hwaddr ram_bases[2], ram_sizes[2]; > long bios_size; > >