From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Manos Pitsidianakis" <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>,
Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] hw/vfio/common: Use RCU_READ macros
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:13:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fbf0024-3a2c-4656-8407-fa271a8bb7ec@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a55d793c-3d61-4bda-8213-12a1de65c85f@linaro.org>
On 2/16/24 09:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 24/1/24 15:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 24/1/24 10:25, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> Replace the manual rcu_read_(un)lock calls by the
>>>> *RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD macros (See commit ef46ae67ba
>>>> "docs/style: call out the use of GUARD macros").
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> hw/vfio/common.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
>>>> index 4aa86f563c..09878a3603 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
>>>> @@ -308,13 +308,13 @@ static void vfio_iommu_map_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb)
>>>> return;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - rcu_read_lock();
>>>> + RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();
>>>>
>>>> if ((iotlb->perm & IOMMU_RW) != IOMMU_NONE) {
>>>> bool read_only;
>>>>
>>>> if (!vfio_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, &vaddr, NULL, &read_only)) {
>>>> - goto out;
>>>> + return;
>>>
>>> Since this is the only early return, we could alternatively do:
>>>
>>> - if (!vfio_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, &vaddr, NULL, &read_only)) {
>>> + if (vfio_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, &vaddr, NULL, &read_only)) {
>>>
>>> remove the goto/return, and wrap the rest of the codeflow in this if's brackets. And then we could use WITH_RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD instead. That'd increase the code indentation however.
>>
>> If the maintainer agrees with the style & code churn, I don't
>> mind respining.
>
> Alex, Cédric, any preference?
my choice would be to keep the 'goto' statement and protect
the vfio_get_xlat_addr() call with :
+ WITH_RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() {
+ if (vfio_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, NULL, &translated_addr, NULL)) {
+ ret = vfio_get_dirty_bitmap(bcontainer, iova,
+ iotlb->addr_mask + 1,
+ translated_addr);
+ if (ret) {
+ error_report("vfio_iommu_map_dirty_notify(%p,"
+ " 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx
+ ", 0x%"HWADDR_PRIx") = %d (%s)",
+ bcontainer, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, ret,
+ strerror(-ret));
+ }
+ }
}
Thanks,
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 7:41 [PATCH 0/6] hw/accel: Use RCU_READ macros Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] accel/tcg/cpu-exec: Use RCU_READ macro Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 9:34 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-01-24 21:14 ` Richard Henderson
2024-01-28 1:07 ` Richard Henderson
2024-01-24 7:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] hw/9pfs/9p-synth: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 7:49 ` Greg Kurz
2024-01-24 13:15 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2024-01-24 7:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] hw/display/virtio-gpu-udmabuf: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 9:13 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-01-24 7:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] hw/scsi/virtio-scsi: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 9:17 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-01-24 10:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 7:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] hw/vfio/common: Use RCU_READ macros Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 9:25 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2024-01-24 14:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-16 8:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-02-16 9:13 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-01-24 7:42 ` [PATCH 6/6] hw/virtio/vhost: Use RCU_READ macro Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-01-24 9:15 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fbf0024-3a2c-4656-8407-fa271a8bb7ec@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).