From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZMQ6-0006Kx-0a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:39:14 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZMQ3-0006KI-Ae
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:39:12 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33056 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZMQ3-0006KA-7T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:39:11 -0500
Received: from mail-bw0-f205.google.com ([209.85.218.205]:50261)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>) id 1LZMQ2-0002gS-Sv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:39:11 -0500
Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so3943451bwz.10
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:39:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <499A80EF.30903@siemens.com>
References: <309a0db40902170027s75a1505fn6de64be94a82e05e@mail.gmail.com>
	<499A80EF.30903@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:39:07 +0000
Message-ID: <309a0db40902170139j389ec978h80cc405f37e80d7c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Resume Flag support on i386/x86_64?
From: Alex Smith <alex@alex-smith.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

2009/2/17 Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
> I think so. Will take some fiddling within the code generator, will see
> what I can do, but you have to be patient (long to-do list...) -- or
> look into this on your own. ;)
>
> Well, in the meantime you may also find a correct behavior by running
> qemu in kvm mode because then the real hardware is used, and that should
> already work as expected.

Ok, I'll look into that. Waiting is OK - For now I've done a quick
hack in my debugger that emulates the resume flag behaviour using
single-stepping (disable breakpoint, step one instruction, reenable
and continue).

Thanks,
Alex