From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
avocado-devel <avocado-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alex Bennee <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: acceptance-system-fedora and acceptance-system-centos failing sporadically with timeout?
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:09:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30cab296-77ae-a76d-b450-a507c967413e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dee3488c-ca1d-24bc-5900-117992d30013@redhat.com>
On 2/5/21 5:49 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 05/02/2021 17.43, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Cc'ing Avocado team & John (Python inferior exit delay?).
>>
>> On 1/28/21 11:10 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 28/01/2021 10.45, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>>>
>>>> is it just me, or is the CI sometimes failing with timeout?
>>>>
>>>> Fedora:
>>>> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/jobs/986936506
>>>
>>> I've sent a patch for that issue just yesterday:
>>>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-01/msg06852.html
>>>
>>>> CentOS:
>>>> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/jobs/980769080
>>>
>>> Never seen that one before - if you hit it again, could you please save
>>> the artifacts and have a look at the log file in there to see what's
>>> exactly the problem?
>>
>> https://gitlab.com/philmd/qemu/-/jobs/1008007125
>>
>> (28/36)
>> tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_ppc_mac99:
>> ERROR: Test reported status but did not finish (90.09 s)
>>
>> Attached debug.log.
>
> That's again the failing test on the mac99 machine where I've already
> sent a patch for. I'm looking for a log of the failing or1k machine that
> Claudio has experienced in the CentOS pipeline.
Oh sorry I should have started a new thread instead :/
There is still a problem that "Test reported status but did
not finish" and make the CI red, while the debug.log show the
test succeeded. This is where I'd like Avocado guys and John
feedback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 9:45 acceptance-system-fedora and acceptance-system-centos failing sporadically with timeout? Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-28 10:00 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 10:10 ` Thomas Huth
2021-01-28 10:11 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-02-05 16:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-05 16:49 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-05 17:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-02-05 20:31 ` John Snow
2021-02-05 22:19 ` [Avocado-devel] " Beraldo Leal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30cab296-77ae-a76d-b450-a507c967413e@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=avocado-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).