From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Ivan Warren" <ivan@vmfacility.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/tcg: mttcg remove false-negative halted assertion
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 14:28:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30d59aff-54c1-9250-67c7-2e6f2d2ff320@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230829010658.8252-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
On 8/28/23 18:06, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> mttcg asserts that an execution ending with EXCP_HALTED must have
> cpu->halted. However between the event or instruction that sets
> cpu->halted and requests exit and the assertion here, an
> asynchronous event could clear cpu->halted.
>
> This leads to crashes running AIX on ppc/pseries because it uses
> H_CEDE/H_PROD hcalls, where H_CEDE sets self->halted = 1 and
> H_PROD sets other cpu->halted = 0 and kicks it.
>
> H_PROD could be turned into an interrupt to wake, but several other
> places in ppc, sparc, and semihosting follow what looks like a similar
> pattern setting halted = 0 directly. So remove this assertion.
>
> Reported-by: Ivan Warren <ivan@vmfacility.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops-mttcg.c | 11 -----------
> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
The adjustments of 'halted' and 'prod' are done under the io lock in both cases, so
there's no race there.
It is perfectly reasonable that after thread A sets halted and drops the lock, thread B
may acquire the lock and clear halted before thread A has a chance to complete longjmp and
cycle through its main loop.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>
> diff --git a/accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops-mttcg.c b/accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops-mttcg.c
> index b276262007..d0b6f288d9 100644
> --- a/accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops-mttcg.c
> +++ b/accel/tcg/tcg-accel-ops-mttcg.c
> @@ -98,17 +98,6 @@ static void *mttcg_cpu_thread_fn(void *arg)
> case EXCP_DEBUG:
> cpu_handle_guest_debug(cpu);
> break;
> - case EXCP_HALTED:
> - /*
> - * during start-up the vCPU is reset and the thread is
> - * kicked several times. If we don't ensure we go back
> - * to sleep in the halted state we won't cleanly
> - * start-up when the vCPU is enabled.
> - *
> - * cpu->halted should ensure we sleep in wait_io_event
> - */
> - g_assert(cpu->halted);
> - break;
I adjusted the patch to keep the case label and update the comment, still dropping the assert.
Queued to tcg-next.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-09 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 1:06 [PATCH] accel/tcg: mttcg remove false-negative halted assertion Nicholas Piggin
2023-09-09 21:28 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2023-09-21 18:25 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-09-27 10:38 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30d59aff-54c1-9250-67c7-2e6f2d2ff320@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=ivan@vmfacility.fr \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).