From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epKR2-0002kl-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:59:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epKQz-0007ID-Bd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:59:16 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::243]:33088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epKQz-0007HS-4W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:59:13 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x243.google.com with SMTP id g12so3807003pgs.0 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:59:12 -0800 (PST) References: <20180217182323.25885-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <20180217182323.25885-39-richard.henderson@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <30d86f9d-2fa9-dda2-4acc-7331b48b395c@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:59:09 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v2 38/67] target/arm: Implement SVE Partition Break Group List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , qemu-arm On 02/23/2018 08:41 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 February 2018 at 18:22, Richard Henderson > wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson >> --- >> target/arm/helper-sve.h | 18 ++++ >> target/arm/sve_helper.c | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> target/arm/translate-sve.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++ >> target/arm/sve.decode | 19 ++++ >> 4 files changed, 380 insertions(+) > > >> + b = g & n; /* guard true, pred true*/ > > missing space before */ > >> +/* Given a computation function, compute a merging BRK. */ >> +static void compute_brk_m(uint64_t *d, uint64_t *n, uint64_t *g, >> + intptr_t oprsz, bool after) > > Comment says "given a computation function" but the prototype > doesn't take a function as parameter ? Whoops, old comment. FWIW, it did at one point. r~