From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:00:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3101996a-93f6-b7e3-a44b-4e663f6beff6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121145001.5e7a182d.cohuck@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4663 bytes --]
On 11/21/19 2:50 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:43:26 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Now that we know the protection state off the cpus, we can start
>> handling all diag 308 subcodes in the protected state.
>
> "As we now have access to the protection state of the cpus, we can
> implement special handling of diag 308 subcodes for cpus in the
> protected state."
>
> ?
Sure
>
>>
>> For subcodes 0 and 1 we need to unshare all pages before continuing,
>> so the guest doesn't accidently expose data when dumping.
>>
>> For subcode 3/4 we tear down the protected VM and reboot into
>> unprotected mode. We do not provide a secure reboot.
>>
>> Before we can do the unshare calls, we need to mark all cpus as
>> stopped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> target/s390x/diag.c | 4 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> index 7262453616..6fd50b4c42 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
>> @@ -319,11 +319,26 @@ static inline void s390_do_cpu_ipl(CPUState *cs, run_on_cpu_data arg)
>> s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
>> }
>>
>> +static void s390_pv_prepare_reset(CPUS390XState *env)
>> +{
>> + CPUState *cs;
>> +
>> + if (!env->pv) {
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
>> + s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_STOPPED, S390_CPU(cs));
>> + }
>> + s390_pv_unshare();
>> + s390_pv_perf_clear_reset();
>> +}
>> +
>> static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>> {
>> enum s390_reset reset_type;
>> CPUState *cs, *t;
>> S390CPU *cpu;
>> + CPUS390XState *env;
>>
>> /* get the reset parameters, reset them once done */
>> s390_ipl_get_reset_request(&cs, &reset_type);
>> @@ -332,29 +347,38 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>> s390_cmma_reset();
>>
>> cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
>> + env = &cpu->env;
>>
>> switch (reset_type) {
>> case S390_RESET_MODIFIED_CLEAR: /* Subcode 0 */
>> + subsystem_reset();
>> + s390_crypto_reset();
>> + s390_pv_prepare_reset(env);
>> CPU_FOREACH(t) {
>> run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_full_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>> }
>> - subsystem_reset();
>> - s390_crypto_reset();
>
> This also switches the order in which different parts are reset for
> normal guests. I presume that order doesn't matter here?
I don't think that the order is specified in the POP, it is however
specified for protected VMs...
>
>> run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>> break;
>> case S390_RESET_LOAD_NORMAL: /* Subcode 1*/
>
> missing blank before */ (introduced in a previous patch)
Will fix
>
>
>> + subsystem_reset();
>> + s390_pv_prepare_reset(env);
>> CPU_FOREACH(t) {
>> if (t == cs) {
>> continue;
>> }
>> run_on_cpu(t, s390_do_cpu_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>> }
>> - subsystem_reset();
>> run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_initial_reset, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>> run_on_cpu(cs, s390_do_cpu_load_normal, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
>> break;
>> case S390_RESET_EXTERNAL:
>
> Annotate this with the subcode as well? (in the patch introducing it)
Sure
>
>> case S390_RESET_REIPL: /* Subcode 4 */
>> + if (env->pv) {
>> + CPU_FOREACH(t) {
>> + s390_pv_vcpu_destroy(t);
>> + }
>> + s390_pv_vm_destroy();
>> + }
>> qemu_devices_reset();
>> s390_crypto_reset();
>> /* configure and start the ipl CPU only */
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
>> index 32049bb4ee..db6d79cef3 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ int handle_diag_288(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3)
>> static int diag308_parm_check(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t addr,
>> uintptr_t ra, bool write)
>> {
>> + /* Handled by the Ultravisor */
>> + if (env->pv) {
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> if ((r1 & 1) || (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
>> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
>> return -EINVAL;
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-20 11:43 [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 01/15] s390x: Cleanup cpu resets Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:32 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 12:53 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:11 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:17 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 02/15] s390x: Beautify diag308 handling Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:27 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 11:28 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:20 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:53 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:36 ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-07 7:56 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 13:12 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] s390x: protvirt: Sync PV state Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 13:43 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:43 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 13:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:33 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 14:25 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 14:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-21 14:32 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-22 13:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 13:49 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:07 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 14:20 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:00 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-11-21 14:04 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:23 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:29 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 15:11 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 16:38 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-28 16:54 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:24 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-22 13:48 ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] RFC: s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 12:19 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:30 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 15:39 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:40 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 16:08 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 15:28 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 15:36 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:10 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-28 16:24 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 20:08 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 11:29 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 15:30 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 13:26 ` [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 13:33 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 9:13 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 9:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 11:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-29 12:14 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 12:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-29 14:02 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 14:30 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2019-12-03 10:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3101996a-93f6-b7e3-a44b-4e663f6beff6@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).