From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Stephen Checkoway" <stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Wei Yang" <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Removed an unused timer
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:39:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <310808da-71c5-19d8-be81-ae255682e79e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190505200602.12412-2-philmd@redhat.com>
On 05/05/19 22:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The 'CFI01' NOR flash was introduced in commit 29133e9a0fff, with
> timing modelled. One year later, the CFI02 model was introduced
> (commit 05ee37ebf630) based on the CFI01 model. As noted in the
You got those commit references backwards, I believe:
* Commit 29133e9a0fff ("AMD NOR flash device support (initial patch by
Jocelyn Mayer)", 2006-06-25) introduced "hw/pflash_cfi02.c".
* Commit 05ee37ebf630 ("Gumstix 'connex' board support by Thorsten
Zitterell.", 2007-11-17) introduced "hw/pflash_cfi01.c".
> header, "It does not support timings". 12 years later, we never
> had to model the device timings. Time to remove the unused timer,
> we can still add it back if required.
>
> Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> Yes, I plan to model those timings later. Actually I have a series
> working, but I'd rather first
> 1/ refactor common code between the both CFI implementations,
Good idea.
> 2/ discuss on list whether or not use timings for the Virt flash.
What would the timer buy us (specifically wrt. cfi01 / OVMF / ArmVirt)?
Being faithful to actual hardware is always good... except when it runs
a significant risk of regressions. :) By that I don't mean "programming
errors"; I mean that guest code would now have to conform to various
timeouts, and that always makes me a bit concerned.
For this patch, with the commit references fixed:
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Laszlo
> ---
> hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 15 ---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> index 16dfae14b80..6dc04f156a7 100644
> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
> #include "hw/block/flash.h"
> #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
> #include "qapi/error.h"
> -#include "qemu/timer.h"
> #include "qemu/bitops.h"
> #include "qemu/host-utils.h"
> #include "qemu/log.h"
> @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@ struct PFlashCFI01 {
> uint8_t cfi_table[0x52];
> uint64_t counter;
> unsigned int writeblock_size;
> - QEMUTimer *timer;
> MemoryRegion mem;
> char *name;
> void *storage;
> @@ -110,18 +108,6 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pflash = {
> }
> };
>
> -static void pflash_timer (void *opaque)
> -{
> - PFlashCFI01 *pfl = opaque;
> -
> - trace_pflash_timer_expired(pfl->cmd);
> - /* Reset flash */
> - pfl->status ^= 0x80;
> - memory_region_rom_device_set_romd(&pfl->mem, true);
> - pfl->wcycle = 0;
> - pfl->cmd = 0;
> -}
> -
> /* Perform a CFI query based on the bank width of the flash.
> * If this code is called we know we have a device_width set for
> * this flash.
> @@ -771,7 +757,6 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> pfl->max_device_width = pfl->device_width;
> }
>
> - pfl->timer = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, pflash_timer, pfl);
> pfl->wcycle = 0;
> pfl->cmd = 0;
> pfl->status = 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-05 20:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] hw/block/pflash: Add DeviceReset() handlers Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:05 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Removed an unused timer Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:05 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-06 0:50 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-06 14:39 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-05-06 15:00 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Extract the pflash_reset() code Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:05 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-06 0:54 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-06 14:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-06 14:51 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-05 20:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] hw/block/pflash_cfi01: Add the DeviceReset() handler Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-06 1:00 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-06 14:54 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-05 20:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Extract the pflash_reset() code Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-06 1:05 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-06 14:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-06 15:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Add the DeviceReset() handler Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-05 20:06 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-06 1:05 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-06 15:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-06 18:32 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=310808da-71c5-19d8-be81-ae255682e79e@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stephen.checkoway@oberlin.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).