From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MmQfL-0007HF-EX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:21:15 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MmQfF-0007F8-1D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:21:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43537 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmQfD-0007Eq-0m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:21:07 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f203.google.com ([209.85.212.203]:36218)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <cochard@gmail.com>) id 1MmQfC-0004ou-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:21:06 -0400
Received: by vws41 with SMTP id 41so1124359vws.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cochard@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20090911213508.GA97446@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
References: <20090911213508.GA97446@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:20:45 +0200
Message-ID: <3131aa530909120420ge13c7arfd1eb6e9224d6581@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu serial: lost tx irqs (affectig FreeBSD's new
	uart(4) driver)
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> wro=
te:

> ...fixes the issue for me, but I'm not 100% sure if this might cause
> rx irqs to come (too?) late when a guest keeps sending while its
> receiving at the same time. =A0Anyone care to comment? :)
>

Your patch fix the issue for me too.

Thanks a lot's Juergen !

Regards,

Olivier