From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] hw/boards: Rename no_sdcard -> auto_create_sdcard
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:19:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31346ebc-aa7d-45f2-b840-6dc3450983c6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204180746.58357-4-philmd@linaro.org>
On 04/02/2025 19.07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Invert the 'no_sdcard' logic, renaming it as the more explicit
> "auto_create_sdcard". Machines are supposed to create a SD Card
> drive when this flag is set. In many cases it doesn't make much
> sense (as boards don't expose SD Card host controller), but this
> is patch only aims to expose that nonsense; so no logical change
> intended (mechanical patch using gsed).
>
> Most of the changes are:
>
> - mc->no_sdcard = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
> + mc->auto_create_sdcard = true;
>
> Except in
> . hw/core/null-machine.c
> . hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> . hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> where the disabled option is manually removed (since default):
...
> diff --git a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> index dc80181ea43..2d626a96b9b 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> @@ -463,11 +463,10 @@ static void zynq_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> mc->desc = "Xilinx Zynq Platform Baseboard for Cortex-A9";
> mc->init = zynq_init;
> mc->max_cpus = ZYNQ_MAX_CPUS;
> - mc->no_sdcard = ON_OFF_AUTO_ON;
> mc->ignore_memory_transaction_failures = true;
> mc->valid_cpu_types = valid_cpu_types;
> mc->default_ram_id = "zynq.ext_ram";
> - mc->no_sdcard = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF;
> + mc->auto_create_sdcard = true;
That's now wrong, too ... it should get removed (as you say in the patch
description).
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 18:07 [PATCH v2 0/8] hw/boards: Try to make sense of MachineClass::no_sdcard flag Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] hw/boards: Convert no_sdcard flag to OnOffAuto tri-state Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] hw/boards: Explicit no_sdcard=false as ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:16 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] hw/boards: Rename no_sdcard -> auto_create_sdcard Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:19 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2025-02-04 18:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] hw/boards: Remove all invalid uses of auto_create_sdcard=true Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:26 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-05 7:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-06 10:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-06 12:56 ` BALATON Zoltan
2025-02-06 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-06 13:44 ` BALATON Zoltan
2025-02-07 12:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-10 14:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-10 14:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] hw/ppc/e500: Remove empty ppce500_machine_class_init() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:27 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] hw/arm: Remove all invalid uses of auto_create_sdcard=true Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:44 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-04 19:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] hw/riscv: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:46 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-04 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] hw/boards: Ensure machine setting auto_create_sdcard expose a SD Bus Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-04 18:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] hw/boards: Try to make sense of MachineClass::no_sdcard flag Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=31346ebc-aa7d-45f2-b840-6dc3450983c6@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).