From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCuON-0001rf-Ue for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:29:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCuON-0004HK-6L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 16:29:43 -0500 References: <20171109141631.25688-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <32123081-9a79-fcfc-d754-7c5a48e6f1c5@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:29:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171109141631.25688-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] blockdev-backup: enable non-root nodes for backup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, den@openvz.org On 11/09/2017 09:16 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > What was the reason to abandon non-root nodes? Eric had it correct: we were never convinced it work would properly, so we went with a smaller set.