From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS6nf-0005Jk-M6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:09:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS6nd-0002I5-P5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:09:50 -0400 References: <20160726125254.GA14135@igalia.com> <3e44ef27-7c67-c4ac-dc66-e29306421a73@redhat.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <32cb75ec-51fc-9898-516e-95c28f602225@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:09:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3e44ef27-7c67-c4ac-dc66-e29306421a73@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH for-2.6 0/2] Fix regression with the default naming of throttling groups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz , Alberto Garcia , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-stable@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Michael Roth On 07/26/2016 11:34 AM, Max Reitz wrote: > On 26.07.2016 14:52, Alberto Garcia wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:05:12PM +0300, Alberto Garcia wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Stefan reported this, this is a regression caused by commit >>> efaa7c4eeb7490c6f37f3. >>> >>> I sent a separate series for the git master, this is the backport >>> for QEMU v2.6.0. >> >> ping > > We don't have a tree for 2.6.0, do we? I thought it only got pulled in > when the stable release is being prepared. > > Max > Yeah, we don't really have a 2.6-stable tree except for the brief period of time that Michael Roth is working actively on the release. Usually CCing qemu-stable is good enough. --js