From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, thuth@redhat.com,
pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/ccw: create s390 phb for compat reasons as well
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:03:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33493193-b9fc-e76f-f30e-c23d68e34289@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170918085542.13265-1-cohuck@redhat.com>
On 18.09.2017 10:55, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> d32bd032d8 ("s390x/ccw: create s390 phb conditionally") made
> registering the s390 pci host bridge conditional on presense
> of the zpci facility bit. Sadly, that breaks migration from
> machines that did not use the cpu model (2.7 and previous).
>
> Create the s390 phb for pre-cpu model machines as well: We can
> tweak s390_has_feat() to always indicate the zpci facility bit
> when no cpu model is available (on 2.7 and previous compat machines).
>
> Fixes: d32bd032d8 ("s390x/ccw: create s390 phb conditionally")
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> v2->v3:
> - no longer RFC (I tested a bit more)
> - removed unrelated hunk
> - more verbose patch description
>
> I'll wait a bit for more acks/reviews and will probably send a pull
> request for s390x tomorrow or so before the amount of queued patches
> gets out of hand...
>
> ---
> target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> index c295e641e6..5169379db5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ bool s390_has_feat(S390Feat feat)
> }
> }
> #endif
> + if (feat == S390_FEAT_ZPCI) {
> + return true;
> + }
> return 0;
> }
> return test_bit(feat, cpu->model->features);
>
1. cpu->model will always be set for QEMU, so you can move that into the
ifdef, next do the other checks. You can even send a cleanup to remove
the if (kvm_enabled()) check.
2. "return pci_available" ?
--
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-18 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 8:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] s390x/ccw: create s390 phb for compat reasons as well Cornelia Huck
2017-09-18 8:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-18 9:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-18 12:03 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2017-09-18 12:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-18 12:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-18 12:16 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33493193-b9fc-e76f-f30e-c23d68e34289@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).