qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: no more pullreq processing til February
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:07:37 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <334e1cd4-04e1-2ec9-a342-de13e3fd922f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmb1pfas.fsf@linaro.org>



On 1/26/23 10:57, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> 
>> Hi; we've run out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes for this month.
>> This leaves us the choice of:
>>   (a) don't process any more pullreqs til we get more minutes in Feb
>>   (b) merge pullreqs blindly without CI testing
>>   (c) buy more minutes
>>
>> For the moment I propose to take option (a). My mail filter will
>> continue to track pullreqs that get sent to the list, but I won't
>> do anything with them.
>>
>> If anybody has a better suggestion feel free :-)
> 
> I've submitted a support request (#366644) to GitLab to see if they will
> give us more minutes for this month. Longer term ideas:
> 
>   * Reduce compile time by reducing number of identical object files we
>     build for specific_ss
>   * Move more tests over to custom runners (don't we have an x86 box
>     somewhere?)
>   * Carry out an audit of code coverage for different test sets and
>     rationalise our CI set

What about sub-maintainers running the CI jobs before sending PRs? Should we
stop it? I usually do a full CI run before sending a ppc queue but if we're
having problems with gitlab pipeline minutes then perhaps we should stop
doing that.


Thanks,

Daniel

> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-26 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 13:22 no more pullreq processing til February Peter Maydell
2023-01-26 13:52 ` Eldon Stegall
2023-01-26 14:13   ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-26 14:27     ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-26 14:38     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 18:41       ` Eldon Stegall
2023-01-27  9:53         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:18   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:30     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-27  8:50       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-26 13:57 ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-26 14:07   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2023-01-26 14:27     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:35   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:41     ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-26 18:17       ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-26 20:49         ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-26 14:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-26 14:28   ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-27  7:36     ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-27 12:39     ` Kevin Wolf
2023-01-27 12:47       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-27 13:11       ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-27 13:12         ` Peter Maydell
2023-02-01 16:18       ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-27  9:30 ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=334e1cd4-04e1-2ec9-a342-de13e3fd922f@gmail.com \
    --to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).