From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
Anton Nefedov <anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] mirror: restore offset after zeroing out the image
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:16:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33cf3518-bf30-88fa-5fb5-17d9ddff503d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485771730-19849-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2832 bytes --]
On 01/30/2017 04:22 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> If explicit zeroing out before mirroring is required for the target image,
> it moves the block job offset counter to EOF, then offset and len counters
> count the image size twice.
>
> There is no harm but confusing stats (e.g. for 1G image the completion
> counter starts from 1G and increases to 2G)
>
> The patch fixed that problem by resetting the offset counter.
Counters are explicitly documented NOT tied to disk length; they are
merely estimates of proportional completion. I'm not sure if this makes
the numbers jump backwards from the observer's viewpoint, but if you can
ever spot 1g/1g right before rewinding to 0g/1g (where pre-patch could
see 1g/2g), then that is a reason to not take this patch. On the other
hand, your argument that the pre-patch behavior progressing towards 2g
has a very fast progression from 0-1g/2g, and then a much slower
1g-2g/2g, which makes the estimate of percent completion skewed, while a
newer progression of 0-1g/1g is more realistic, may have some merit.
I'm not sold on this patch yet, but stronger arguments in the commit
message may sway me.
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/094.out
> @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
> Formatting 'TEST_DIR/source.IMGFMT', fmt=IMGFMT size=67108864
> {"return": {}}
> {"return": {}}
> -{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "BLOCK_JOB_READY", "data": {"device": "src", "len": 67108864, "offset": 67108864, "speed": 0, "type": "mirror"}}
> +{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "BLOCK_JOB_READY", "data": {"device": "src", "len": 0, "offset": 0, "speed": 0, "type": "mirror"}}
> {"return": {}}
This part of the change is scary - a ready event showing 0/0 HAS been
known to confuse libvirt in the past. Qemu should NEVER advertise a
ready event with 0/0, it should at least be 1/1 (because of the number
of clients that have workarounds to deal with older qemu behavior on 0/0
and which might misbehave if we ever issue that again).
> -{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED", "data": {"device": "src", "len": 67108864, "offset": 67108864, "speed": 0, "type": "mirror"}}
> +{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED", "data": {"device": "src", "len": 0, "offset": 0, "speed": 0, "type": "mirror"}}
So NACK to the patch as currently written, but not necessarily to the
idea if you can give better progress numbers and never reach the state
of BLOCK_JOB_READY and BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED with a 0/0 length/offset.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 10:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] mirror: restore offset after zeroing out the image Denis V. Lunev
2017-01-30 17:16 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-01-30 17:33 ` Denis V. Lunev
2017-01-30 18:10 ` Anton Nefedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33cf3518-bf30-88fa-5fb5-17d9ddff503d@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).