From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: "fam@euphon.net" <fam@euphon.net>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>,
"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] util/hbitmap: strict hbitmap_reset
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:38:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <341d5b43-950b-2a3c-8cd1-20bd7b59b7b0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190916080002.GB10930@localhost.localdomain>
On 9/16/19 4:00 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 13.09.2019 um 20:49 hat John Snow geschrieben:
>> On 9/12/19 4:20 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Also, I'm not sure about "are" suggested by Max. "are" is for plural, but here I meant
>>> one object: sum of @start and @count.
>>>
>>
>> There's not great agreement universally about how to treat things like
>> collective nouns. Sometimes "Data" is singular, but sometimes it's
>> plural. "It depends."
>>
>> In this case, "start + count" refers to one sum, but two constituent
>> pieces, so it's functioning like a collective noun.
>>
>> We might say "a + b (together) /are/ ..." but also "the sum of a + b /is/".
>>
>>> So, you may use exactly "Sum of @start and @count is" or "(@start + @count) sum is" or
>>> just "(@start + @count) is", whichever you like more.
>>>
>>
>> I like using "the sum of @x and @y is" for being grammatically unambiguous.
>>
>> updated and pushed.
>>
>> (Sorry about my language again! --js)
>
> Time to revive https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8725621/? ;-)
>
> Kevin
>
Ja, bitte.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 15:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] util/hbitmap: strict hbitmap_reset Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-08-06 16:09 ` Max Reitz
2019-08-06 16:19 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-08-07 16:27 ` John Snow
2019-09-11 15:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-09-11 17:59 ` John Snow
2019-09-12 8:20 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-09-13 18:49 ` John Snow
2019-09-16 8:00 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-09-16 16:38 ` John Snow [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=341d5b43-950b-2a3c-8cd1-20bd7b59b7b0@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).