From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] usb: Remove legacy -usbdevice option
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 08:23:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <351493cf-fa56-491c-c646-49727e6611ed@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64a364f0-3dc0-87c4-f0b0-a79365032a8e@redhat.com>
On 04.01.2018 18:10, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/01/2018 16:59, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>> But instead of introducing a new "-braille" parameter, maybe we should
>> rather keep some of the convenience "-usbdevice" possibilities around?
>> E.g. keep "-usbdevice braille", "-usbdevice mouse", etc. but remove
>> things like "-usbdevice serial" and "-usbdevice host" where the code is
>> rather ugly and the user do not gain much in comparison to "-device" ?
>
> That would work too. But I'm not sure why keep all the usbdevice
> infrastructure when we can do the same (at the price of a small cmdline
> incompatibility) with only 50 lines of code.
I'm just afraid that we will end up with more new parameters in the end
than just "-braille" - or do we feel confident enough that "-usbdevice
braille" is the only one that would need a sugared replacement?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-08 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 13:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] usb: Remove legacy -usbdevice option Thomas Huth
2018-01-04 14:09 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 14:12 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-04 14:15 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 14:21 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 15:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 15:24 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 15:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 15:32 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 15:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 15:35 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-04 15:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 15:52 ` Peter Maydell
2018-01-05 8:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-01-04 15:56 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 17:45 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-04 17:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 18:02 ` Samuel Thibault
2018-01-08 7:43 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-09 9:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 15:59 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-04 17:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-08 7:23 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2018-01-09 9:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 11:00 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-09 11:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-09 11:57 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-09 13:45 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2018-01-04 15:42 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-05 8:18 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-01-05 9:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-05 10:09 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=351493cf-fa56-491c-c646-49727e6611ed@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).