From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ely2d-0002CJ-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:28:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ely2Z-0000UH-Ul for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:28:11 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:54656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ely2Z-0000TC-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:28:07 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id o189so3256972wme.4 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 06:28:07 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Bonzini References: <20180213173429.19501-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20180213173429.19501-2-stefanha@redhat.com> <20180213180918.GY573@redhat.com> Message-ID: <353f9a65-82ae-f68b-1419-090ee6327d2d@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:27:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] Add a git-publish configuration file List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P._Berrang=c3=a9?=" , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 14/02/2018 15:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 13/02/2018 19:09, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> Why is a custom entry needed for block here (and other things >> below). Won't running get_maintainer.pl already correctly >> report when a patch needs cc'ing to qemu-block@nongnu.org >> based on MAINTAINER rules ? > > Sometimes you want to CC block people even on a non-block patch, for > example if you want their opinion about using the API. > > We should probably add at least arm and ppc profiles, too. Nevermind, they were there below qemu-block. Paolo >> --nogit --nogit-fallback > > QEMU's getmaintainer (unlike the Linux version!) already tries to avoid > falling back to git if a maintainer is listed. Are these options necessary? > > Paolo >