Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 27/02/19 17:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.02.19 16:36, no-reply@patchew.org wrote:
>> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
>> more information:
>>
>> Message-id: 20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com
>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls
>> Type: series
>>
>> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
>> #!/bin/bash
>> git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0
>> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
>> git config --local diff.renames True
>> git config --local diff.algorithm histogram
>> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base..
>> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
>>
>> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
>> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
>>  * [new tag]               patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com -> patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com
>>  * [new tag]               patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com -> patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com
>>  * [new tag]               patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiwell@linux.ibm.com -> patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiwell@linux.ibm.com
>> Switched to a new branch 'test'
>>
>> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
>> checkpatch.pl: no revisions returned for revlist '1'
> 
> While patchew seems to be broken right now, I wonder why patches are
> tested that are long upstream? Is this some leftover from fixing patchew?

Yes, Patchew is just catching up. :)

Paolo