From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz25K-00062f-Br for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:29:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz25B-0007bw-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:29:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gz25A-0007YG-OV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:29:21 -0500 References: <155128177405.1544.2035274805815542420@49fa7ef69f7b> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <35cc802d-22af-53d3-83a3-b6fe2d776248@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:29:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: fam@euphon.net, rth@twiddle.net On 27/02/19 17:10, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 27.02.19 16:36, no-reply@patchew.org wrote: >> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com/ >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for >> more information: >> >> Message-id: 20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com >> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] include/exec/helper-head.h: support "const void *" in helper calls >> Type: series >> >> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === >> #!/bin/bash >> git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 >> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 >> git config --local diff.renames True >> git config --local diff.algorithm histogram >> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. >> === TEST SCRIPT END === >> >> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 >> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu >> * [new tag] patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com -> patchew/20190221093459.22547-1-david@redhat.com >> * [new tag] patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com -> patchew/20190225012530.28225-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com >> * [new tag] patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiwell@linux.ibm.com -> patchew/20190225162325.24008-1-maxiwell@linux.ibm.com >> Switched to a new branch 'test' >> >> === OUTPUT BEGIN === >> checkpatch.pl: no revisions returned for revlist '1' > > While patchew seems to be broken right now, I wonder why patches are > tested that are long upstream? Is this some leftover from fixing patchew? Yes, Patchew is just catching up. :) Paolo