qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	stefano.stabellini@amd.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
	Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [QEMU][PATCH v4 04/10] xen-hvm: reorganize xen-hvm and move common function to xen-hvm-common
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:38:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35e561e8-df9e-5ca8-7367-07db3388b0ac@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2301251329520.1978264@ubuntu-linux-20-04-desktop>

Hi Stefano,

On 1/25/23 1:55 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
>> From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch does following:
>> 1. creates arch_handle_ioreq() and arch_xen_set_memory(). This is done in
>>      preparation for moving most of xen-hvm code to an arch-neutral location,
>>      move the x86-specific portion of xen_set_memory to arch_xen_set_memory.
>>      Also, move handle_vmport_ioreq to arch_handle_ioreq.
>>
>> 2. Pure code movement: move common functions to hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c
>>      Extract common functionalities from hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c and move them to
>>      hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c. These common functions are useful for creating
>>      an IOREQ server.
>>
>>      xen_hvm_init_pc() contains the architecture independent code for creating
>>      and mapping a IOREQ server, connecting memory and IO listeners, initializing
>>      a xen bus and registering backends. Moved this common xen code to a new
>>      function xen_register_ioreq() which can be used by both x86 and ARM machines.
>>
>>      Following functions are moved to hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c:
>>          xen_vcpu_eport(), xen_vcpu_ioreq(), xen_ram_alloc(), xen_set_memory(),
>>          xen_region_add(), xen_region_del(), xen_io_add(), xen_io_del(),
>>          xen_device_realize(), xen_device_unrealize(),
>>          cpu_get_ioreq_from_shared_memory(), cpu_get_ioreq(), do_inp(),
>>          do_outp(), rw_phys_req_item(), read_phys_req_item(),
>>          write_phys_req_item(), cpu_ioreq_pio(), cpu_ioreq_move(),
>>          cpu_ioreq_config(), handle_ioreq(), handle_buffered_iopage(),
>>          handle_buffered_io(), cpu_handle_ioreq(), xen_main_loop_prepare(),
>>          xen_hvm_change_state_handler(), xen_exit_notifier(),
>>          xen_map_ioreq_server(), destroy_hvm_domain() and
>>          xen_shutdown_fatal_error()
>>
>> 3. Removed static type from below functions:
>>      1. xen_region_add()
>>      2. xen_region_del()
>>      3. xen_io_add()
>>      4. xen_io_del()
>>      5. xen_device_realize()
>>      6. xen_device_unrealize()
>>      7. xen_hvm_change_state_handler()
>>      8. cpu_ioreq_pio()
>>      9. xen_exit_notifier()
>>
>> 4. Replace TARGET_PAGE_SIZE with XC_PAGE_SIZE to match the page side with Xen.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>
> One comment below
>
> [...]
>
>> +void xen_exit_notifier(Notifier *n, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    XenIOState *state = container_of(n, XenIOState, exit);
>> +
>> +    xen_destroy_ioreq_server(xen_domid, state->ioservid);
> In the original code we had:
>
> -    if (state->fres != NULL) {
> -        xenforeignmemory_unmap_resource(xen_fmem, state->fres);
> -    }
>
> Should we add it here?
>
>
> I went through the manual process of comparing all the code additions
> and deletions (not fun!) and everything checks out except for this.
thanks for catching this. There were two recent commits in upstream and 
i missed those. I rechecked and there are actually three other lines 
which needs update. I will address it in v5.
>
>> +    xenevtchn_close(state->xce_handle);
>> +    xs_daemon_close(state->xenstore);
>> +}


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-25 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-25  8:53 [QEMU][PATCH v4 00/10] Introduce xenpvh machine for arm architecture Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25  8:53 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 01/10] hw/i386/xen/: move xen-mapcache.c to hw/xen/ Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25 22:59   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-26  2:39     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25  8:53 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 02/10] hw/i386/xen: rearrange xen_hvm_init_pc Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 03/10] hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm: move x86-specific fields out of XenIOState Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 04/10] xen-hvm: reorganize xen-hvm and move common function to xen-hvm-common Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25 21:55   ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-25 22:38     ` Vikram Garhwal [this message]
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 05/10] include/hw/xen/xen_common: return error from xen_create_ioreq_server Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25 21:58   ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 06/10] hw/xen/xen-hvm-common: skip ioreq creation on ioreq registration failure Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25 22:01   ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 07/10] hw/xen/xen-hvm-common: Use g_new and error_setg_errno Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25 22:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-26  5:32     ` Frediano Ziglio
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 08/10] meson.build: do not set have_xen_pci_passthrough for aarch64 targets Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 09/10] hw/arm: introduce xenpvh machine Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-25 22:20   ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-26  2:44     ` Vikram Garhwal
2023-01-26 15:39       ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-01-25  8:54 ` [QEMU][PATCH v4 10/10] meson.build: enable xenpv machine build for ARM Vikram Garhwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35e561e8-df9e-5ca8-7367-07db3388b0ac@amd.com \
    --to=vikram.garhwal@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).