From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Nina Schoetterl-Glausch" <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>
Cc: Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 07:07:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <363f8d66-646f-43cf-a49c-cf47af7dec19@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240306095407.3058909-12-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
On 06/03/2024 10.54, Zhao Liu wrote:
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
>
> Since s390 machine supports both "drawers" and "books" in -smp, add the
> "drawers" and "books" combination test case to match the actual topology
> usage scenario.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> index aea1b2e73a55..0cf611519865 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,33 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_with_drawers_invalid[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static const struct SMPTestData data_with_drawers_books_invalid[] = {
> + {
> + /*
> + * config: -smp 200,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=2,cores=4,\
> + * threads=2,maxcpus=200
> + */
> + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_BOOKS_DRAWERS(T, 200, T, 3, T, 5, T,
> + 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 200),
> + .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: "
> + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: "
> + "drawers (3) * books (5) * sockets (2) * "
> + "cores (4) * threads (2) != maxcpus (200)",
> + }, {
> + /*
> + * config: -smp 242,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=2,cores=4,\
> + * threads=2,maxcpus=240
> + */
> + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_BOOKS_DRAWERS(T, 242, T, 3, T, 5, T,
> + 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 240),
> + .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: "
> + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: "
> + "drawers (3) * books (5) * sockets (2) * "
> + "cores (4) * threads (2) "
> + "== maxcpus (240) < smp_cpus (242)",
> + },
> +};
> +
> static char *smp_config_to_string(const SMPConfiguration *config)
> {
> return g_strdup_printf(
> @@ -698,6 +725,14 @@ static void machine_with_drawers_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> mc->smp_props.drawers_supported = true;
> }
>
> +static void machine_with_drawers_books_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> +{
> + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> +
> + mc->smp_props.drawers_supported = true;
> + mc->smp_props.books_supported = true;
> +}
> +
> static void test_generic_valid(const void *opaque)
> {
> const char *machine_type = opaque;
> @@ -936,6 +971,67 @@ static void test_with_drawers(const void *opaque)
> object_unref(obj);
> }
>
> +static void test_with_drawers_books(const void *opaque)
> +{
> + const char *machine_type = opaque;
> + Object *obj = object_new(machine_type);
> + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj);
> + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(obj);
> + SMPTestData data = {};
> + unsigned int num_drawers = 5, num_books = 3;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data_generic_valid); i++) {
> + data = data_generic_valid[i];
> + unsupported_params_init(mc, &data);
> +
> + /*
> + * when drawers and books parameters are omitted, they will
> + * be both set as 1.
> + */
> + data.expect_prefer_sockets.drawers = 1;
> + data.expect_prefer_sockets.books = 1;
> + data.expect_prefer_cores.drawers = 1;
> + data.expect_prefer_cores.books = 1;
> +
> + smp_parse_test(ms, &data, true);
> +
> + /* when drawers and books parameters are both specified */
> + data.config.has_drawers = true;
> + data.config.drawers = num_drawers;
> + data.config.has_books = true;
> + data.config.books = num_books;
> +
> + if (data.config.has_cpus) {
> + data.config.cpus *= num_drawers * num_books;
> + }
> + if (data.config.has_maxcpus) {
> + data.config.maxcpus *= num_drawers * num_books;
> + }
> +
> + data.expect_prefer_sockets.drawers = num_drawers;
> + data.expect_prefer_sockets.books = num_books;
> + data.expect_prefer_sockets.cpus *= num_drawers * num_books;
> + data.expect_prefer_sockets.max_cpus *= num_drawers * num_books;
> +
> + data.expect_prefer_cores.drawers = num_drawers;
> + data.expect_prefer_cores.books = num_books;
> + data.expect_prefer_cores.cpus *= num_drawers * num_books;
> + data.expect_prefer_cores.max_cpus *= num_drawers * num_books;
> +
> + smp_parse_test(ms, &data, true);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data_with_drawers_books_invalid); i++) {
> + data = data_with_drawers_books_invalid[i];
> + unsupported_params_init(mc, &data);
> +
> + smp_parse_test(ms, &data, false);
> + }
> +
> + object_unref(obj);
> +}
> +
> /* Type info of the tested machine */
> static const TypeInfo smp_machine_types[] = {
> {
> @@ -968,6 +1064,10 @@ static const TypeInfo smp_machine_types[] = {
> .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-drawers"),
> .parent = TYPE_MACHINE,
> .class_init = machine_with_drawers_class_init,
> + }, {
> + .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-drawers-books"),
> + .parent = TYPE_MACHINE,
> + .class_init = machine_with_drawers_books_class_init,
> }
> };
>
> @@ -997,6 +1097,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_drawers",
> MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-drawers"),
> test_with_drawers);
> + g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_drawers_books",
> + MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-drawers-books"),
> + test_with_drawers_books);
>
> g_test_run();
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 9:53 [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup on SMP and its test Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Remove deprecated "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 02/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:22 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-07 7:07 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Simplify variables' initialization in machine_parse_smp_config() Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 13:20 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-08 15:33 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-10 11:55 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-11 5:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-13 10:52 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-18 8:06 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-18 11:18 ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Calculate total CPUs once " Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 20:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Drop the unsupported "dies=1" case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 13:22 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06 9:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 07/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:01 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-07 7:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 08/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 09/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 10/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 11/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:07 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 12/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 13/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test smp_props.has_clusters Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 9:54 ` [PATCH 14/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-07 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06 21:07 ` [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup on SMP and its test Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-07 7:25 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=363f8d66-646f-43cf-a49c-cf47af7dec19@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).