From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
aliguori@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in addition to vhost param'
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:06:28 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <373579236.9177551.1423739188738.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150212102931.GA22283@redhat.com>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
> > guest don't have MSI-X support.
> > Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
> > like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
> > guests without MSI-X support is getting less popular.
> >
> > Its ok to remove this extra option and enable vhost
> > on the basis of vhost=ON/OFF.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
>
> The patch doesn't seem to do what it says.
> Did you try with a non MSIX guest and vhost=on, to check that
> it actually runs vhost and not userspace virtio?
No, I have not. I just did basic tested a new guest without vhostforce.
I will test non-MSIX guest and share the result.
>
> > ---
> > net/tap.c | 4 +---
> > net/vhost-user.c | 16 ++--------------
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/tap.c b/net/tap.c
> > index 1fe0edf..bd2efa9 100644
> > --- a/net/tap.c
> > +++ b/net/tap.c
> > @@ -634,13 +634,11 @@ static int net_init_tap_one(const NetdevTapOptions
> > *tap, NetClientState *peer,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (tap->has_vhost ? tap->vhost :
> > - vhostfdname || (tap->has_vhostforce && tap->vhostforce)) {
> > + if (tap->has_vhost ? tap->vhost : vhostfdname) {
> > VhostNetOptions options;
> >
> > options.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_KERNEL;
> > options.net_backend = &s->nc;
> > - options.force = tap->has_vhostforce && tap->vhostforce;
> >
> > if (tap->has_vhostfd || tap->has_vhostfds) {
> > vhostfd = monitor_handle_fd_param(cur_mon, vhostfdname);
> > diff --git a/net/vhost-user.c b/net/vhost-user.c
> > index 24e050c..d2d7bf2 100644
> > --- a/net/vhost-user.c
> > +++ b/net/vhost-user.c
> > @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> > typedef struct VhostUserState {
> > NetClientState nc;
> > CharDriverState *chr;
> > - bool vhostforce;
> > VHostNetState *vhost_net;
> > } VhostUserState;
> >
> > @@ -51,7 +50,6 @@ static int vhost_user_start(VhostUserState *s)
> > options.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER;
> > options.net_backend = &s->nc;
> > options.opaque = s->chr;
> > - options.force = s->vhostforce;
> >
> > s->vhost_net = vhost_net_init(&options);
> >
> > @@ -133,8 +131,7 @@ static void net_vhost_user_event(void *opaque, int
> > event)
> > }
> >
> > static int net_vhost_user_init(NetClientState *peer, const char *device,
> > - const char *name, CharDriverState *chr,
> > - bool vhostforce)
> > + const char *name, CharDriverState *chr)
> > {
> > NetClientState *nc;
> > VhostUserState *s;
> > @@ -149,7 +146,6 @@ static int net_vhost_user_init(NetClientState *peer,
> > const char *device,
> > /* We don't provide a receive callback */
> > s->nc.receive_disabled = 1;
> > s->chr = chr;
> > - s->vhostforce = vhostforce;
> >
> > qemu_chr_add_handlers(s->chr, NULL, NULL, net_vhost_user_event, s);
> >
> > @@ -230,7 +226,6 @@ int net_init_vhost_user(const NetClientOptions *opts,
> > const char *name,
> > {
> > const NetdevVhostUserOptions *vhost_user_opts;
> > CharDriverState *chr;
> > - bool vhostforce;
> >
> > assert(opts->kind == NET_CLIENT_OPTIONS_KIND_VHOST_USER);
> > vhost_user_opts = opts->vhost_user;
> > @@ -247,12 +242,5 @@ int net_init_vhost_user(const NetClientOptions *opts,
> > const char *name,
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > - /* vhostforce for non-MSIX */
> > - if (vhost_user_opts->has_vhostforce) {
> > - vhostforce = vhost_user_opts->vhostforce;
> > - } else {
> > - vhostforce = false;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return net_vhost_user_init(peer, "vhost_user", name, chr, vhostforce);
> > + return net_vhost_user_init(peer, "vhost_user", name, chr);
> > }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-12 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-12 6:20 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in addition to vhost param' Pankaj Gupta
2015-02-12 10:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-12 11:06 ` Pankaj Gupta [this message]
2015-02-12 15:41 ` Pankaj Gupta
2015-02-15 2:41 ` Jason Wang
2015-02-19 12:02 ` Pankaj Gupta
2015-02-19 14:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=373579236.9177551.1423739188738.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).