From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85776C433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24502651D1 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:13:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 24502651D1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:36602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHZS-0006oh-1s for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:13:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHXo-00057t-52 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:11:40 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:36598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJHXg-0003Md-E9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:11:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1615216291; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6OekX8ONpS/gjOz0PsnNXv1lpZoUpcEsCGWTG9otrSA=; b=BHt8UmudtOcbh1k3zqmJ3XppD2IBQn+hCV6W3eC1up42bjlu5kBvHzo45Njph+uTQExmbw E1fX6q3jIqcXBCqjoFuwZkSznG7QatliCT8ydzcmdn1pZRyV73WViU+TCo0zFGXbMOg6q0 +gPjSPrA3gRwc2ggBCI6rb6GZsHYzXg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-253-UTCAV9fgN1u4VO925Hy5_w-1; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:11:29 -0500 X-MC-Unique: UTCAV9fgN1u4VO925Hy5_w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2363C1084D82; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-113-198.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.198]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E042119D9D; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:11:22 +0000 (UTC) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= References: <20210307113403.11028-1-thuth@redhat.com> <878s6xam83.fsf@linaro.org> From: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Merge the Gitlab-CI section into the generic CI section Message-ID: <3815e29f-6a22-fa6b-0a25-4b354b30b7eb@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:11:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.251, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Willian Rampazzo , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 08/03/2021 14.34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 3/8/21 12:57 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Thomas Huth writes: >> >>> The status of the gitlab-CI files is currently somewhat confusing, and >>> it is often not quite clear whether a patch should go via my tree or >>> via the testing tree of Alex. That situation has grown historically... >>> Initially, I was the only one using the gitlab-CI, just for my private >>> repository there. But in the course of time, the gitlab-CI switched to >>> use the containers from tests/docker/ (which is not part of the gitlab-CI >>> section in the MAINTAINERS file), and QEMU now even switched to gitlab.com >>> completely for the repository and will soon use it as its gating CI, too. >>> So it makes way more sense if the gitlab-ci.yml files belong to the people >>> who are owning the qemu-project on gitlab.com and take care of the gitlab >>> CI there. Thus let's merge the gitlab-ci section into the common "test and >>> build automation" section, >> >> I have no problem with this, might as well keep it all together. >> >>> and change the status of myself to a "reviewer" >>> there instead. >> >> Can we not have multiple maintainers? Considering how important keeping >> the testing green should be wouldn't it help to keep the bus factor >> lower (not to mention holidays/breaks and just plain busy with other >> things periods). It shouldn't be to hard to track as long as we mention >> when we queue things to our trees? > > I'm OK to be listed as backup maintainer as I do have a genuine > interest in CI/testing. It will be in my scarcer personal time > although, so better if another maintainers with more resources > could pop up along instead. Well, I guess if Philippe is around for helping at least with the maintainer stuff in the qemu-project on gitlab.com, I can also continue as a backup for picking up the related CI patches if you like (unless someone else wants to volunteer)... I'll send a v2 for this patch accordingly... Thomas