qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] block: convert crypto driver to bdrv_co_preadv|pwritev
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:08:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3867f025-5d0b-5bed-d47f-a91c706cd3aa@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831110518.10741-4-berrange@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4070 bytes --]

On 08/31/2017 06:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Make the crypto driver implement the bdrv_co_preadv|pwritev
> callbacks,  and also use bdrv_co_preadv|pwritev for I/O
> with the protocol driver beneath.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/crypto.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 

>  static coroutine_fn int
> -block_crypto_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> -                      int remaining_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
> +block_crypto_co_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
> +                       QEMUIOVector *qiov, int flags)

>  {
>      BlockCrypto *crypto = bs->opaque;
> -    int cur_nr_sectors; /* number of sectors in current iteration */
> +    uint64_t cur_bytes; /* number of bytes in current iteration */
>      uint64_t bytes_done = 0;
>      uint8_t *cipher_data = NULL;
>      QEMUIOVector hd_qiov;
>      int ret = 0;
> -    size_t payload_offset =
> -        qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block) / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +    size_t payload_offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block);

Pre-existing: is size_t the right type, or can we overflow a 64-bit
offset on a 32-bit host?

> +    uint64_t sector_num = offset / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +
> +    assert((offset % BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) == 0);
> +    assert((bytes % BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) == 0);

The osdep.h macros might be nicer than open-coding; furthermore, if
desired, you could shorten to:

assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset | bytes, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE));


>  
>  static coroutine_fn int
> -block_crypto_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> -                       int remaining_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
> +block_crypto_co_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
> +                        QEMUIOVector *qiov, int flags)
>  {

Hmm - you don't set supported_write_flags.  But presumably, if the
underlying BDS supports BDRV_REQUEST_FUA, then crypto can likewise
support that flag by passing it through to the underlying device after
encryption.

>      BlockCrypto *crypto = bs->opaque;
> -    int cur_nr_sectors; /* number of sectors in current iteration */
> +    uint64_t cur_bytes; /* number of bytes in current iteration */
>      uint64_t bytes_done = 0;
>      uint8_t *cipher_data = NULL;
>      QEMUIOVector hd_qiov;
>      int ret = 0;
> -    size_t payload_offset =
> -        qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block) / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +    size_t payload_offset = qcrypto_block_get_payload_offset(crypto->block);
> +    uint64_t sector_num = offset / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> +
> +    assert((offset % BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) == 0);
> +    assert((bytes % BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) == 0);

Same comment as for read.

> @@ -611,8 +613,9 @@ BlockDriver bdrv_crypto_luks = {
>      .bdrv_truncate      = block_crypto_truncate,
>      .create_opts        = &block_crypto_create_opts_luks,
>  
> -    .bdrv_co_readv      = block_crypto_co_readv,
> -    .bdrv_co_writev     = block_crypto_co_writev,
> +    .bdrv_refresh_limits = block_crypto_refresh_limits,
> +    .bdrv_co_preadv      = block_crypto_co_preadv,
> +    .bdrv_co_pwritev     = block_crypto_co_pwritev,
>      .bdrv_getlength     = block_crypto_getlength,
>      .bdrv_get_info      = block_crypto_get_info_luks,
>      .bdrv_get_specific_info = block_crypto_get_specific_info_luks,

Looks weird when = isn't consistently aligned, but we use more than one
space.  My preference is to just use one space everywhere, as adding a
longer name to the list doesn't require a mass re-format of all other
entries; but I'm not opposed when people like the aligned = for
legibility.  So up to you if you do anything in response to my nit.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 619 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-31 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-31 11:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] block: improve luks driver perf & switch to byte APIs Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] block: use 1 MB bounce buffers for crypto instead of 16KB Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] block: use BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE in crypto driver Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 14:54   ` Eric Blake
2017-09-05  9:52   ` Kevin Wolf
2017-09-05 10:05     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-09-05 10:23       ` Kevin Wolf
2017-08-31 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] block: convert crypto driver to bdrv_co_preadv|pwritev Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 15:08   ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-09-12 10:14     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] block: convert qcrypto_block_encrypt|decrypt to take bytes offset Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 15:17   ` Eric Blake
2017-08-31 15:22     ` Daniel P. Berrange

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3867f025-5d0b-5bed-d47f-a91c706cd3aa@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).