qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 7/7] colo-compare: add TCP, UDP, ICMP packet comparison
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:04:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3895f14c-67ac-5505-20b3-870bd6368ece@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469497794-16976-8-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>



On 2016年07月26日 09:49, Zhang Chen wrote:
> We add TCP,UDP,ICMP packet comparison to replace
> IP packet comparison. This can increase the
> accuracy of the package comparison.
> less checkpoint more efficiency.

s/less/Less/

>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   net/colo-compare.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   trace-events       |   4 ++
>   2 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
> index e020edc..c7bb5f7 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>   #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
>   #include "qapi/error.h"
>   #include "net/net.h"
> +#include "net/eth.h"
>   #include "net/vhost_net.h"
>   #include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
>   #include "qemu/iov.h"
> @@ -197,9 +198,158 @@ static int colo_packet_compare(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt)
>       }
>   }
>   
> -static int colo_packet_compare_all(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> +/*
> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
> + * for compare tcp packet
> + * compare_tcp copied from Dr. David Alan Gilbert's branch
> + */
> +static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> +{
> +    struct tcphdr *ptcp, *stcp;
> +    int res;
> +    char *sdebug, *ddebug;
> +
> +    trace_colo_compare_main("compare tcp");
> +    if (ppkt->size != spkt->size) {
> +        if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> +            trace_colo_compare_main("pkt size not same");
> +        }
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    ptcp = (struct tcphdr *)ppkt->transport_layer;
> +    stcp = (struct tcphdr *)spkt->transport_layer;
> +
> +    if (ptcp->th_seq != stcp->th_seq) {
> +        if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> +            trace_colo_compare_main("pkt tcp seq not same");
> +        }
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The 'identification' field in the IP header is *very* random
> +     * it almost never matches.  Fudge this by ignoring differences in
> +     * unfragmented packets; they'll normally sort themselves out if different
> +     * anyway, and it should recover at the TCP level.
> +     * An alternative would be to get both the primary and secondary to rewrite
> +     * somehow; but that would need some sync traffic to sync the state
> +     */
> +    if (ntohs(ppkt->ip->ip_off) & IP_DF) {
> +        spkt->ip->ip_id = ppkt->ip->ip_id;
> +        /* and the sum will be different if the IDs were different */
> +        spkt->ip->ip_sum = ppkt->ip->ip_sum;

This looks dangerous. If packet were not logical same, ip cusm of 
secondary were changed.

> +    }
> +
> +    res = memcmp(ppkt->data + ETH_HLEN, spkt->data + ETH_HLEN,
> +                (spkt->size - ETH_HLEN));
> +
> +    if (res != 0 && trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
> +        sdebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src));
> +        ddebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst));
> +        fprintf(stderr, "%s: src/dst: %s/%s p: seq/ack=%u/%u"
> +        " s: seq/ack=%u/%u res=%d flags=%x/%x\n", __func__,
> +                   sdebug, ddebug,
> +                   ntohl(ptcp->th_seq), ntohl(ptcp->th_ack),
> +                   ntohl(stcp->th_seq), ntohl(stcp->th_ack),
> +                   res, ptcp->th_flags, stcp->th_flags);
> +
> +        trace_colo_compare_tcp_miscompare("Primary len", ppkt->size);
> +        qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", ppkt->size);
> +        trace_colo_compare_tcp_miscompare("Secondary len", spkt->size);
> +        qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", spkt->size);
> +
> +        g_free(sdebug);
> +        g_free(ddebug);
> +    }
> +
> +    return res;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
> + * for compare udp packet
> + */
> +static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> +{
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    trace_colo_compare_main("compare udp");
> +    ret = colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt);
> +
> +    if (ret) {
> +        trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("primary pkt size", ppkt->size);
> +        qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", ppkt->size);
> +        trace_colo_compare_udp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size", spkt->size);
> +        qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare", spkt->size);
> +    }
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
> + * for compare icmp packet
> + */
> +static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
>   {

Consider icmp packet were usually not big, why not simply use memcpy? (I 
think I asked the same question in the past).

> -    trace_colo_compare_main("compare all");
> +    int network_length;
> +    struct icmp *icmp_ppkt, *icmp_spkt;
> +
> +    trace_colo_compare_main("compare icmp");
> +    network_length = ppkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
> +    if (ppkt->size != spkt->size ||
> +        ppkt->size < network_length + ETH_HLEN) {
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +    icmp_ppkt = (struct icmp *)(ppkt->data + network_length + ETH_HLEN);
> +    icmp_spkt = (struct icmp *)(spkt->data + network_length + ETH_HLEN);
> +
> +    if ((icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == icmp_spkt->icmp_type) &&
> +        (icmp_ppkt->icmp_code == icmp_spkt->icmp_code)) {
> +        if (icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == ICMP_REDIRECT) {
> +            if (icmp_ppkt->icmp_gwaddr.s_addr !=
> +                icmp_spkt->icmp_gwaddr.s_addr) {
> +                trace_colo_compare_main("icmp_gwaddr.s_addr not same");
> +                return -1;
> +            }
> +        } else if ((icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == ICMP_UNREACH) &&
> +                   (icmp_ppkt->icmp_type == ICMP_UNREACH_NEEDFRAG)) {
> +            if (icmp_ppkt->icmp_nextmtu != icmp_spkt->icmp_nextmtu) {
> +                trace_colo_compare_main("icmp_nextmtu not same");
> +                return -1;
> +            }
> +        }
> +
> +        if (colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt)) {
> +            trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
> +                                               ppkt->size);
> +            qemu_hexdump((char *)ppkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
> +                         ppkt->size);
> +            trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("Secondary pkt size",
> +                                               spkt->size);
> +            qemu_hexdump((char *)spkt->data, stderr, "colo-compare",
> +                         spkt->size);
> +            return -1;
> +        }
> +    } else {
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * called from the compare thread on the primary
> + * for compare other packet
> + */
> +static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
> +{
> +    trace_colo_compare_main("compare other");
> +    trace_colo_compare_ip_info(ppkt->size, inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_src),
> +                               inet_ntoa(ppkt->ip->ip_dst), spkt->size,
> +                               inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_src),
> +                               inet_ntoa(spkt->ip->ip_dst));
>       return colo_packet_compare(ppkt, spkt);
>   }
>   
> @@ -263,8 +413,24 @@ static void colo_compare_connection(void *opaque, void *user_data)
>       while (!g_queue_is_empty(&conn->primary_list) &&
>              !g_queue_is_empty(&conn->secondary_list)) {
>           pkt = g_queue_pop_tail(&conn->primary_list);
> -        result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
> -                              pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_all);
> +        switch (conn->ip_proto) {
> +        case IPPROTO_TCP:
> +            result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
> +                     pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_tcp);
> +            break;
> +        case IPPROTO_UDP:
> +            result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
> +                     pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_udp);
> +            break;
> +        case IPPROTO_ICMP:
> +            result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
> +                     pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_icmp);
> +            break;
> +        default:
> +            result = g_queue_find_custom(&conn->secondary_list,
> +                     pkt, (GCompareFunc)colo_packet_compare_other);
> +            break;
> +        }
>   
>           if (result) {
>               ret = compare_chr_send(s->chr_out, pkt->data, pkt->size);
> diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> index 1537e91..ab22eb2 100644
> --- a/trace-events
> +++ b/trace-events
> @@ -1919,5 +1919,9 @@ aspeed_vic_write(uint64_t offset, unsigned size, uint32_t data) "To 0x%" PRIx64
>   
>   # net/colo-compare.c
>   colo_compare_main(const char *chr) ": %s"
> +colo_compare_tcp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
> +colo_compare_udp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
> +colo_compare_icmp_miscompare(const char *sta, int size) ": %s = %d"
>   colo_compare_ip_info(int psize, const char *sta, const char *stb, int ssize, const char *stc, const char *std) "ppkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s, spkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s"
>   colo_old_packet_check_found(int64_t old_time) "%" PRId64
> +colo_compare_miscompare(void) ""

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-26  1:49 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 0/7] Introduce COLO-compare Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 1/7] colo-compare: introduce colo compare initialization Zhang Chen
2016-08-02  6:26   ` Jason Wang
2016-08-03  2:51     ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 2/7] colo-base: add colo-base to define and handle packet Zhang Chen
2016-08-02  6:38   ` Jason Wang
2016-08-03  6:34     ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 3/7] Jhash: add linux kernel jhashtable in qemu Zhang Chen
2016-08-02  6:40   ` Jason Wang
2016-08-03  6:36     ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 4/7] colo-compare: track connection and enqueue packet Zhang Chen
2016-08-02  7:14   ` Jason Wang
2016-08-04  6:49     ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 5/7] qemu-char: Add qemu_chr_add_handlers_full() for GMaincontext Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 6/7] colo-compare: introduce packet comparison thread Zhang Chen
2016-08-02  7:52   ` Jason Wang
2016-08-05  7:45     ` Zhang Chen
2016-07-26  1:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V10 7/7] colo-compare: add TCP, UDP, ICMP packet comparison Zhang Chen
2016-08-02  8:04   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2016-08-05  8:55     ` Zhang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3895f14c-67ac-5505-20b3-870bd6368ece@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).