Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/2] s390x: cut down on unattached devices

[Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 11/28/2017 04:21 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
[..]
>>> Otherwise at first glance both patches seem sane.
>>
>> Can I count this as an ack, or do you plan to do more review?
>>
> 
> Yes I was planning to give it another look. And I do already
> have questions. Isn't the QOM composition tree API? I mean
> let's assume the QMP commands working on this tree are not completely
> useless. How is client code (management software) supposed to work,
> assumed it can rely on paths of e.g. properties being stable. Just
> imagine we had this default-cssid property (for the sake of the
> argument, not like we want it) on the css bridge.

Ping! I would like to get this clarified before proceeding with reviewing
this series.

> 
> Now if the composition tree is API then these can only be bug fixes
> (IMHO).
> 
> There are also other oddities I've spotted. My idea was to put
> this composition tree discussion on hold until the vfio-ccw stuff
> is sorted out. I would certainly like to build a better understanding.
> 
> Halil
> 

[..]