qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yangming via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"wangzhigang (O)" <wangzhigang17@huawei.com>,
	"zhangliang (AG)" <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
	xiqi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Subject: Reply: [PATCH v2] virtio-balloon: optimize the virtio-balloon on the ARM platform
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 02:29:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38eb932af8f8438b9984295957943d91@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66f9d36a-3095-5854-5004-030c963166b0@redhat.com>

> On 09.03.23 07:14, Yangming wrote:
> >> On 08.03.23 01:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 06:38:13AM +0000, Yangming wrote:
> >>>> Optimize the virtio-balloon feature on the ARM platform by adding a
> >>>> variable to keep track of the current hot-plugged pc-dimm size,
> >>>> instead of traversing the virtual machine's memory modules to count
> >>>> the current RAM size during the balloon inflation or deflation
> >>>> process. This variable can be updated only when plugging or
> >>>> unplugging the device, which will result in an increase of
> >>>> approximately 60% efficiency of balloon process on the ARM platform.
> >>>>
> >>>> We tested the total amount of time required for the balloon
> >>>> inflation
> >> process on ARM:
> >>>> inflate the balloon to 64GB of a 128GB guest under stress.
> >>>> Before: 102 seconds
> >>>> After: 42 seconds
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Yang yangming73@huawei.com
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Refactor the code by adding comments and removing unnecessary
> code.
> >>>>
> >>>>    hw/mem/pc-dimm.c           |  7 +++++++
> >>>>    hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c | 33 +++++----------------------------
> >>>>    include/hw/boards.h        |  2 ++
> >>>>    3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c b/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c index
> >>>> 50ef83215c..3f2734a267 100644
> >>>> --- a/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
> >>>> +++ b/hw/mem/pc-dimm.c
> >>>> @@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ void pc_dimm_plug(PCDIMMDevice *dimm,
> >> MachineState
> >>>> *machine)
> >>>>
> >>>>        memory_device_plug(MEMORY_DEVICE(dimm), machine);
> >>>>        vmstate_register_ram(vmstate_mr, DEVICE(dimm));
> >>>> +    /* count only "real" DIMMs, not NVDIMMs */
> >>>> +    if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dimm), TYPE_NVDIMM)) {
> >>>> +        machine->device_memory->dimm_size += vmstate_mr->size;
> >>>> +    }
> >>>>    }
> >>>>
> >>>>    void pc_dimm_unplug(PCDIMMDevice *dimm, MachineState
> *machine)
> >>>
> >>> vmstate_mr->size is Int128 you are not supposed to do math on it.
> >>>
> >>> And generally poking at this struct is a bad idea.
> >>>
> >>> I think memory_region_size will do what you want but not 100% sure.
> >>> Maybe you need to look at the flatview ...
> >>
> >> Good point, we should use memory_region_size().
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> David / dhildenb
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion. The problem will be fixed in the upcoming third
> version by using 'memory_region_size()'.
> >
> > By the way, we found that the size of the object is aligned with
> 'qemu_host_page_size' before allocating the memory (see details in
> 'qemu_ram_alloc_internal()' from softmmu/physmem.c). This means that
> the actual allocated memory may differ from the size defined in the Object.
> As a result, in 'get_current_ram_size()', the original method of counting hot-
> plugged memory from the Object may not be accurate. Now, we count the
> size from the memory region, which is a proper way to get the actual size of
> memory allocated.
> 
> You'd have to have a memory backend size that is not aligned to the host
> page size.
> 
> qemu-system-x86_64 -nographic -nodefaults -object memory-backend-
> ram,id=tmp,size=1K
> 
> While that seems to be possible, it's something very odd to happen (I cannot
> think of a reasonable use case).
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> 
> David / dhildenb

Yes, I agree. Besides, a newer version[PATCH v3] has been sent. I am wondering could you please have a look at that?

Best
Qi


      reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  6:14 Reply: [PATCH v2] virtio-balloon: optimize the virtio-balloon on the ARM platform Yangming via
2023-03-09  9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-29  2:29   ` Yangming via [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38eb932af8f8438b9984295957943d91@huawei.com \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangzhigang17@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiqi2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangming73@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).