From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Tolerate CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:34:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38ff2ca7-7156-4ad8-b777-dab689043ecc@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241021121820.483535-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>
On 10/21/24 05:17, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Running qemu-i386 on a system running with SELinux in enforcing mode
> fails with:
>
> qemu-i386: tests/tcg/i386-linux-user/sigreturn-sigmask: Unable to find a guest_base to satisfy all guest address mapping requirements
> 00000000-ffffffff
>
> The reason is that main() determines mmap_min_addr from
> /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr, but SELinux additionally defines
> CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR, which is normally larger: 32K or 64K, but,
> in general, can be anything. There is no portable way to query its
> value: /boot/config, /proc/config and /proc/config.gz are distro- and
> environment-specific.
>
> For maximum compatibility, probing is required. Use pgb_find_fallback()
> for this purpose. The downside of this approach is that mmap_min_addr
> remains incorrect, but there don't seem to be any practical
> consequences from this. If a correct mmap_min_addr will be required in
> the future, probing will need to be moved to linux-user main().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> linux-user/elfload.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
This is
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2598
which we closed as a system configuration / kernel bug.
I'm open to working around the issue, because I can see it coming up again and again.
In pgb_find_fallback, we use a skip value of 4M or 4G, using that skip as the base at
which to begin the search. I think it might be better to use this as the initial start
point in pgb_find_itree as well, rather than mmap_min_addr.
Since I never had a setup in which this triggered, would you be willing to test such a change?
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 12:17 [PATCH] linux-user: Tolerate CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-10-22 2:34 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2024-10-22 9:50 ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2024-10-22 14:33 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38ff2ca7-7156-4ad8-b777-dab689043ecc@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).