From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, s.reiter@proxmox.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dietmar@proxmox.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.0 v3 2/3] block: Increase BB.in_flight for coroutine and sync interfaces
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:56:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <399cb66a-528e-b92b-546f-a712608bcc14@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407144212.GG7695@linux.fritz.box>
07.04.2020 17:42, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 07.04.2020 um 16:22 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
>> 07.04.2020 15:12, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> External callers of blk_co_*() and of the synchronous blk_*() functions
>>> don't currently increase the BlockBackend.in_flight counter, but calls
>>> from blk_aio_*() do, so there is an inconsistency whether the counter
>>> has been increased or not.
>>>
>>> This patch moves the actual operations to static functions that can
>>> later know they will always be called with in_flight increased exactly
>>> once, even for external callers using the blk_co_*() coroutine
>>> interfaces.
>>>
>>> If the public blk_co_*() interface is unused, remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>>
>> side question:
>>
>> Should we inc/dec in blk_make_zero, blk_truncate?
>
> I don't think it's necessary. They call into their bdrv_* counterpart
> immediately, so the node-level counter should be enough.
>
bdrv_make_zero is not one request, it does block_status/pwrite_zeroes in a loop. So drained section may occur during bdrv_make_zero. Possibly, nothing bad in it?
blk_truncate may do coroutine_enter before incrementing node-level counter, which may only schedule it..
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 12:12 [PATCH for-5.0 v3 0/3] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_while_drained() Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 12:12 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v3 1/3] block-backend: Reorder flush/pdiscard function definitions Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 12:12 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v3 2/3] block: Increase BB.in_flight for coroutine and sync interfaces Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 12:54 ` Max Reitz
2020-04-07 14:22 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 14:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 14:56 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2020-04-07 16:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-07 17:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-07 12:12 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v3 3/3] block: Fix blk->in_flight during blk_wait_while_drained() Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=399cb66a-528e-b92b-546f-a712608bcc14@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.reiter@proxmox.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).