From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.caveayland@nutanix.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/i386/isapc: Remove dead Xen code
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39f5f781-398b-4974-8b1e-e7061ed9194f@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <066cb998-e89a-4cd1-a89b-865f4a6dcbbd@nutanix.com>
On 24/11/25 11:27, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 23/11/2025 18:58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
>> We don't use Xen on the isapc machine: let's remove
>> pointless code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/isapc.c | 27 ++++-----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/isapc.c b/hw/i386/isapc.c
>> index 1ba9ae22cc3..1e13a30c505 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/isapc.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/isapc.c
>> @@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
>> #include "hw/ide/ide-bus.h"
>> #include "system/kvm.h"
>> #include "hw/i386/kvm/clock.h"
>> -#include "hw/xen/xen-x86.h"
>> -#include "system/xen.h"
>> #include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc.h"
>> #include "target/i386/cpu.h"
>> @@ -37,7 +35,6 @@ static void pc_init_isa(MachineState *machine)
>> ISABus *isa_bus;
>> uint32_t irq;
>> GSIState *gsi_state;
>> - MemoryRegion *ram_memory;
>> DriveInfo *hd[MAX_IDE_BUS * MAX_IDE_DEVS];
>> int i;
>> @@ -77,15 +74,9 @@ static void pc_init_isa(MachineState *machine)
>> /*
>> * There is no RAM split for the isapc machine
>> */
>> - if (xen_enabled()) {
>> - xen_hvm_init_pc(pcms, &ram_memory);
>> - } else {
>> - ram_memory = machine->ram;
>> -
>> - pcms->max_ram_below_4g = 3.5 * GiB;
>> - x86ms->above_4g_mem_size = 0;
>> - x86ms->below_4g_mem_size = machine->ram_size;
>> - }
>> + pcms->max_ram_below_4g = 3.5 * GiB;
>> + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size = 0;
>> + x86ms->below_4g_mem_size = machine->ram_size;
>> x86_cpus_init(x86ms, pcmc->default_cpu_version);
>> @@ -94,17 +85,7 @@ static void pc_init_isa(MachineState *machine)
>> }
>> /* allocate ram and load rom/bios */
>> - if (!xen_enabled()) {
>> - pc_memory_init(pcms, system_memory, system_memory, 0);
>> - } else {
>> - assert(machine->ram_size == x86ms->below_4g_mem_size +
>> - x86ms->above_4g_mem_size);
>> -
>> - if (machine->kernel_filename != NULL) {
>> - /* For xen HVM direct kernel boot, load linux here */
>> - xen_load_linux(pcms);
>> - }
>> - }
>> + pc_memory_init(pcms, system_memory, system_memory, 0);
>> gsi_state = pc_gsi_create(&x86ms->gsi, false);
>
> FWIW I did contact upstream about this (see https://patchew.org/
> QEMU/20250618112828.235087-1-
> mark.caveayland@nutanix.com/20250618112828.235087-13-
> mark.caveayland@nutanix.com/#91b96b24-af60-4a89-91ec-
> d0e660a76a0a@nutanix.com) and they mentioned that it should work, which
> is why I left it in.
>
> Unfortunately I don't currently have any way to test it here :/
OK :| IMHO upstream Xen maintainers should provide us a test, otherwise
we can not make our code base evolve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-23 18:58 [PATCH] hw/i386/isapc: Remove dead Xen code Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-11-24 10:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-11-24 10:27 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2025-11-24 11:07 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2025-11-24 13:36 ` Alex Bennée
2025-11-24 10:52 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39f5f781-398b-4974-8b1e-e7061ed9194f@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=anthony@xenproject.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.caveayland@nutanix.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).