From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19Mzzs-0007qL-OR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:49:52 -0400
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20)
	id 19MzzP-00072y-Es
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:49:24 -0400
Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.30] helo=mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 19MzzM-0006wZ-Uz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:49:21 -0400
Received: from free.fr (unknown [80.14.188.93])
	by mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 280CD1BFFF81
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 02:49:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3EDBF085.6000308@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 02:49:09 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice.bellard@free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.2 is out
References: <3ED409D1.6040109@free.fr>
	<873city82h.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de> <3EDBD53F.603@free.fr>
	<874r386p8k.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Fabrice Bellard <fabrice.bellard@free.fr> writes:
> 
> 
>>For Alpha: I am using gcc 3.2.3 and '-msmall-text' is not
>>supported. Is it really necessary ?
> 
> 
> Not really, I was just hoping to avoid a few gp readjustments with it,
> however it doesn't really seem to have that effect, since for
> non-static functions, that cannot be done, and for static functions,
> gcc already knows to avoid gp restoring.

Which version of gcc are you using ? Do you use a patched gcc ? Can you 
give me your spec file and the gcc -v log when you compile op-i386.c ?

I am totally unable to get correct code. In particular, I cannot make 
gcc 3.2.3 generate R_ALPHA_BRADDR relocations. Currently, to get correct 
code, I must do the following:
--
int __op_param1;
#define PARAM1 ({ int _r; asm("ldah %0,__op_param1($29) !gprelhigh\n" \
                               "lda %0,__op_param1(%0)   !gprellow" : 
"=r"(_r) ); _r; })

#define CALL(x) asm volatile ("bsr $26, %0" : : "i" (x))
--
and use the macro CALL to call a function!

Fabrice.