From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewmOd-0006jp-NB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 06:15:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewmOY-0006q5-6n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 06:15:35 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:41268 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewmOY-0006pG-1w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 06:15:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A887C6CC for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:15:29 +0000 (UTC) References: <1520942752-19449-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20180315144719.GT3146@redhat.com> <20180316024023.GC13063@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> <20180316094351.GD3066@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <3a776827-ee8b-781f-1485-2fb5de01b8a2@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:15:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180316094351.GD3066@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] docker: fedora: test more components List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P._Berrang=c3=a9?=" , Fam Zheng Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 16/03/2018 10:43, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: >> I wonder if we should simply do "dnf build-dep qemu" and only list add= itional >> (mingw, for example) packages explicitly, like the debian dockerfiles. > From an upstream POV it feels wrong to have our builds depend on the st= ate > of stuff listed in the Fedora RPM spec file, as we don't want changes i= n > Fedora to randomly break QEMU upstream CI.=20 I agree---I'll send v2 of this patch. Paolo