From: Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.0 00/11] target/arm: enforce alignment
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:17:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ab6b7fb-51cf-0ec4-2c70-e86bb01dcc3f@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_ATUZ+v8VE8q34mmi3pLhg3qFDHgi7mQB-JJKDEZuzaw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03.12.2020 19:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:10, Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru> wrote:
>>
>> On 03.12.2020 15:30, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Cc'ing Pavel
>>>
>>> On 12/1/20 4:55 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 04:06, Richard Henderson
>>>> <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905356
>>>>>
>>>>> Not implementing SCTLR.A, but all of the other required
>>>>> alignment for SCTLR.A=0 in Table A3-1.
>>>>
>>>> Something in this series breaks the 'make check-acceptance'
>>>> record-and-replay test:
>>>>
>>>> (30/40) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt:
>>>> PASS (9.14 s)
>>>> (31/40) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_virt:
>>>> INTERRUPTED: Test interrupted by SIGTERM\nRunner error occurred:
>>>> Timeout reached\nOriginal status: ERROR\n{'name':
>>>> '31-tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_virt',
>>>> 'logdir': '/home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-from-laptop/qemu/build/arm-clang/tests/result...
>>>> (90.19 s)
>>>>
>>>> The log shows the "recording execution" apparently hanging,
>>>> with the last output from the guest
>>>> [ 3.183662] Registering SWP/SWPB emulation handler
>>
>> I looked through the patches and it does not seem that they can break
>> anything.
>> Could it be the same avocado/chardev socket glitch as in some previous
>> failures?
>> What happens when re-running this test?
>
> I ran it a couple of times with the patchset and it failed the same
> way each time. Without is fine.
I applied the patches and got no failures on my local machine.
Do you have any ideas on debugging this bug?
What does "arm-clang" means? Is the host compiler is clang?
Pavel Dovgalyuk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 4:06 [PATCH for-6.0 00/11] target/arm: enforce alignment Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] target/arm: Enforce word alignment for LDRD/STRD Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 8:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for LDA/LDAH/STL/STLH Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 8:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for LDM/STM Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for RFE Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for SRS Richard Henderson
2020-12-03 11:38 ` Peter Maydell
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for VLDM/VSTM Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for VLDR/VSTR Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for VLD1 (all lanes) Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for VLDn/VSTn (multiple) Richard Henderson
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] target/arm: Fix decode of align in VLDST_single Richard Henderson
2020-12-01 14:09 ` Peter Maydell
2020-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] target/arm: Enforce alignment for VLDn/VSTn (single) Richard Henderson
2020-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH for-6.0 00/11] target/arm: enforce alignment Peter Maydell
2020-12-01 14:37 ` Richard Henderson
2020-12-01 15:55 ` Peter Maydell
2020-12-03 12:30 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-12-03 16:10 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-12-03 16:14 ` Peter Maydell
2020-12-04 6:17 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk [this message]
2020-12-04 16:36 ` Peter Maydell
2020-12-04 17:28 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ab6b7fb-51cf-0ec4-2c70-e86bb01dcc3f@ispras.ru \
--to=pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).