From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] qapi/introspect.py: add _gen_features helper
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:57:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b1186c1-c927-9d02-126b-c15d372ae97c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k0ul1ydu.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On 11/16/20 3:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> _make_tree might receive a dict or some other type.
>
> Are you talking about @obj?
>
Yes. It *usually* takes a dict. sometimes it doesn't.
>> Adding features
>> information should arguably be performed by the caller at such a time
>> when we know the type of the object and don't have to re-interrogate it.
>
> Fair enough. There are just two such callers anyway.
>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>> index 803288a64e7..16282f2634b 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/introspect.py
>> @@ -76,16 +76,12 @@
>>
>>
>> def _make_tree(obj: Union[_DObject, str], ifcond: List[str],
>> - features: List[QAPISchemaFeature],
>> extra: Optional[Annotations] = None
>> ) -> TreeValue:
>> if extra is None:
>> extra = {}
>> if ifcond:
>> extra['if'] = ifcond
>> - if features:
>> - assert isinstance(obj, dict)
>> - obj['features'] = [(f.name, {'if': f.ifcond}) for f in features]
>> if extra:
>> return (obj, extra)
>> return obj
>> @@ -221,6 +217,11 @@ def _use_type(self, typ: QAPISchemaType) -> str:
>> return '[' + self._use_type(typ.element_type) + ']'
>> return self._name(typ.name)
>>
>> + @classmethod
>> + def _gen_features(cls,
>> + features: List[QAPISchemaFeature]) -> List[TreeValue]:
>> + return [_make_tree(f.name, f.ifcond) for f in features]
>> +
>
> Ignorant question: when to use @classmethod, and when to use
> @staticmethod?
>
Matter of taste. My preference is to just always use @classmethod,
because they can be extended or referenced by subclasses.
@staticmethod does not take a class argument, @classmethod does. Static
methods therefore cannot address any other classmethods, but a
classmethod can.
I just always reach for classmethod by default.
>> def _gen_tree(self, name: str, mtype: str, obj: _DObject,
>> ifcond: List[str],
>> features: Optional[List[QAPISchemaFeature]]) -> None:
>> @@ -233,7 +234,9 @@ def _gen_tree(self, name: str, mtype: str, obj: _DObject,
>> name = self._name(name)
>> obj['name'] = name
>> obj['meta-type'] = mtype
>> - self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, features, extra))
>> + if features:
>> + obj['features'] = self._gen_features(features)
>> + self._trees.append(_make_tree(obj, ifcond, extra))
>>
>> def _gen_member(self,
>> member: QAPISchemaObjectTypeMember) -> TreeValue:
>
> No change when not features. Else, you change
>
> obj['features'] = [(f.name, {'if': f.ifcond}) for f in features]
>
> to
>
> obj['features'] = [_make_tree(f.name, f.ifcond) for f in features]
>
Yep. I am consolidating the logic for (node, annotation) in so doing.
> where
>
> _make_tree(f.name, f.ifcond)
> = (f.name, {'if': f.ifcond}) if f.ifcond
> = f.name else
>
> Works, and feels less lazy. However, the commit message did not prepare
> me for this. If you split this off into its own patch, you can describe
> it properly.
>
OK.
>> @@ -243,7 +246,9 @@ def _gen_member(self,
>> }
>> if member.optional:
>> obj['default'] = None
>> - return _make_tree(obj, member.ifcond, member.features)
>> + if member.features:
>> + obj['features'] = self._gen_features(member.features)
>> + return _make_tree(obj, member.ifcond)
>>
>> def _gen_variants(self, tag_name: str,
>> variants: List[QAPISchemaVariant]) -> _DObject:
>> @@ -255,7 +260,7 @@ def _gen_variant(self, variant: QAPISchemaVariant) -> TreeValue:
>> 'case': variant.name,
>> 'type': self._use_type(variant.type)
>> }
>> - return _make_tree(obj, variant.ifcond, None)
>> + return _make_tree(obj, variant.ifcond)
>>
>> def visit_builtin_type(self, name: str, info: Optional[QAPISourceInfo],
>> json_type: str) -> None:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 19:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] qapi: static typing conversion, pt2 John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] [DO-NOT-MERGE] docs: replace single backtick (`) with double-backtick (``) John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] [DO-NOT-MERGE] docs/sphinx: change default role to "any" John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] [DO-NOT-MERGE] docs: enable sphinx-autodoc for scripts/qapi John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] qapi/introspect.py: add assertions and casts John Snow
2020-11-06 18:59 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] qapi/introspect.py: add preliminary type hint annotations John Snow
2020-11-07 2:12 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-12-07 21:29 ` John Snow
2020-11-13 16:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-07 23:48 ` John Snow
2020-12-16 7:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-16 17:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-12-17 6:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-17 1:35 ` John Snow
2020-12-17 7:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] qapi/introspect.py: add _gen_features helper John Snow
2020-11-07 4:23 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-11-16 8:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-07 23:57 ` John Snow [this message]
2020-12-15 16:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-15 18:49 ` John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] qapi/introspect.py: Unify return type of _make_tree() John Snow
2020-11-07 5:08 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-12-15 0:22 ` John Snow
2020-11-16 9:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-08 0:06 ` John Snow
2020-12-16 6:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] qapi/introspect.py: replace 'extra' dict with 'comment' argument John Snow
2020-11-07 5:10 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-11-16 9:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-08 0:12 ` John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] qapi/introspect.py: create a typed 'Annotated' data strutcure John Snow
2020-11-07 5:45 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-11-16 10:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-08 0:21 ` John Snow
2020-12-16 7:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-17 1:30 ` John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] qapi/introspect.py: improve readability of _tree_to_qlit John Snow
2020-11-07 5:54 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-11-16 10:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-12-15 15:25 ` John Snow
2020-10-26 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] qapi/introspect.py: Add docstring to _tree_to_qlit John Snow
2020-11-07 5:57 ` Cleber Rosa
2020-11-02 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] qapi: static typing conversion, pt2 John Snow
2020-11-04 9:51 ` Marc-André Lureau
2020-12-15 15:52 ` John Snow
2020-11-16 13:17 ` introspect.py output representation (was: [PATCH v2 00/11] qapi: static typing conversion, pt2) Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b1186c1-c927-9d02-126b-c15d372ae97c@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).