From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Willian Rampazzo" <willianr@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitlab-ci/cirrus: Increase timeout to 80 minutes
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:09:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b48a20f-c8db-9ebf-f179-f1843782c229@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZPhHt4JFcz41YFJ@redhat.com>
On 11/16/21 17:49, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:33:09PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The jobs on Cirrus-CI sometimes get delayed quite a bit, waiting to
>> be scheduled, so while the build test itself finishes within 60 minutes,
>> the total run time of the jobs can be longer due to this waiting time.
>> Thus let's increase the timeout on the gitlab side a little bit, so
>> that these jobs are not marked as failing just because of the delay.
>
> On a successful pipeline I see
>
> freebsd-11 - 28 minutes
> freebsd-12 - 57 minutes
> macos - 30 minutes
>
> We know cirrus allows 2 concurrent jobs, so from that I infer
> that the freebsd-12 job was queued for ~30 minutes waiting for
> either the freebsd-11 or macos job to finish, and then it
> ran in 30 minutes, giving the ~60 minute total.
>
> That's too close to the 60 minute gitlab default job timeout
> for comfort - it can easily slip over 60 minutes by just a
> small amount.
>
> 80 minutes will certainly help in the case where we
> randomly take a little longer than 30 minutes to build,
> and have 1 of the 3 jobs queued.
>
> When we're running jobs on both master + staging, we can
> have 2 jobs running and 4 more queued - 2 of those queued
> might just finish in time, but 2 will definitely fail.
> My patch will cut these extra jobs on master, so in common
> case we only ever get 1 queued, which should work well in
> combo with your patch here. That should be good enough
> for the qemu-project namespace, unless someone is triggering
> pipelines for stable branch staging at the same time as
> the master branch staging.
>
> If we do want to worry about more than 2 queued jobs
> again for that reason, we might consider putting
> it upto 100 minutes. That would give us enough slack to
> have 4 queued jobs behind two running jobs and have
> them all succeed
>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
>> index e7b25e7427..22d42585e4 100644
>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/cirrus.yml
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> stage: build
>> image: registry.gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci/cirrus-run:master
>> needs: []
>> + timeout: 80m
>> allow_failure: true
>> script:
>> - source .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/$NAME.vars
>
> Whether 80 or 100 minute, consider it
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
This pipeline took 1h51m09s:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/409666733/builds
But Richard restarted unstable jobs, which probably added time
to the total.
IIRC from a maintainer perspective 1h15 is the upper limit.
80m fits, 100m is over. Up to the project maintainers
(personally I don't have any objection, in particular if
this reduces the failures rate).
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 16:33 [PATCH] gitlab-ci/cirrus: Increase timeout to 80 minutes Thomas Huth
2021-11-16 16:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-16 17:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-11-16 17:22 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-16 17:36 ` Richard Henderson
2021-11-16 18:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-17 7:03 ` Thomas Huth
2021-11-16 17:17 ` Willian Rampazzo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b48a20f-c8db-9ebf-f179-f1843782c229@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
--cc=willianr@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).