From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghywS-0004s2-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:41:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghywQ-0006Oj-El for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:41:52 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghywP-0006NX-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 10:41:50 -0500 References: <20190111143815.26107-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <89afa3af-940d-7f3b-ee7c-25027bfd18f5@redhat.com> <87sgxzusb7.fsf@linaro.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <3b4aa1f9-c18a-e2d7-abdd-f688bed9f4a1@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:41:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87sgxzusb7.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests: replace rem = sleep(time) with g_timer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, cota@braap.org, ehabkost@redhat.com On 11/01/19 16:28, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: >> Why not g_usleep? It already does a while loop around nanosleep (whic= h >> returns the remaining time in the wait, like select but unlike sleep a= nd >> poll). > Yeah I'm testing that now. However I have managed to trigger: >=20 > ERROR:tests/test-qht-par.c:20:test_qht: assertion failed (rc =3D=3D 0= ): (35584 =3D=3D 0) I think that's a good old SIGSEGV (0x8B00). Paolo