From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: s390 private runner CI job timing out
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:40:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b5cc225-50e8-e56d-3fa8-da052a515beb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_HVpYajJ5yP7+eYKNhKggtNjgFyQ_V3WqSPf4dGL=zKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 06.04.23 um 11:21 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 07:57, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/04/2023 17.15, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> The s390 private runner CI job ubuntu-20.04-s390x-all seems to have
>>> started timing out a lot recently. Here's an example where it passed,
>>> but with only 53 seconds left on the clock before it would have been
>>> killed:
>>>
>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/4066136770
>>>
>>> It looks like 'make check' was about 30 minutes of the 75 minutes
>>> total, and compilation was 45 minutes.
>>>
>>> Any suggestions for how we can trim this down? (Presumably we
>>> could also raise the time limit given that this is a private
>>> runner job...)
>>
>> I don't have access to that system, so I can only guess: Did you check
>> whether there are any other processes still running (leftovers from earlier
>> test runs)?
>
> I did check for that, as it's been a problem in the past, but
> no, in this case no other jobs are running in the VM.
>
>> If not, it's maybe because it is a VM that is running with other
>> VMs in parallel that hog the CPU? In that case, you could contact the owner
>> of the machine and ask whether there is anything that could be done about
>> it. Or simply increase the timeout a little bit more... (our highest timeout
>> in another job is 90 minutes, so I think that would still be OK?).
>
> Christian, does our S390X machine get a guaranteed amount of CPU,
> or does it depend on what else is running on the hardware?
I think its a shared system with shared CPUs. Can you check the steal
time in top or proc? If this is far too high we could ask to give you
more weight for that VM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 15:15 s390 private runner CI job timing out Peter Maydell
2023-04-06 6:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-06 9:21 ` Peter Maydell
2023-04-06 10:40 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2023-04-06 10:44 ` Peter Maydell
2023-04-06 11:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-04-06 12:05 ` Peter Maydell
2023-04-06 12:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-04-06 12:28 ` Peter Maydell
2023-04-06 12:30 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-06 12:39 ` Peter Maydell
2023-04-06 12:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-04-06 14:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2023-04-06 12:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b5cc225-50e8-e56d-3fa8-da052a515beb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).