Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] s390x: refactor reset/reipl handling

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 23.04.2018 12:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:33:13 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>>>  static void s390_ipl_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>>> index 0570d0ad75..102f1ea7af 100644
>>> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>>> @@ -87,7 +87,17 @@ int s390_ipl_set_loadparm(uint8_t *loadparm);
>>>  void s390_ipl_update_diag308(IplParameterBlock *iplb);
>>>  void s390_ipl_prepare_cpu(S390CPU *cpu);
>>>  IplParameterBlock *s390_ipl_get_iplb(void);
>>> -void s390_reipl_request(void);
>>> +
>>> +enum s390_reset {
>>> +    /* default is a reset not triggered by a CPU e.g. issued by QMP */
>>> +    S390_RESET_EXTERNAL = 0,
>>> +    S390_RESET_REIPL,
>>> +    S390_RESET_MODIFIED_CLEAR,
>>> +    S390_RESET_LOAD_NORMAL,
>>> +};
>>> +void s390_ipl_reset_request(CPUState *cs, enum s390_reset reset_type);
>>> +void s390_ipl_get_reset_request(CPUState **cs, enum s390_reset *reset_type);
>>> +void s390_ipl_clear_reset_request(void);
>>>  
>>>  #define QIPL_ADDRESS  0xcc
>>>  
>>> @@ -129,9 +139,11 @@ struct S390IPLState {
>>>      bool enforce_bios;
>>>      IplParameterBlock iplb;
>>>      bool iplb_valid;
>>> -    bool reipl_requested;
>>>      bool netboot;
>>>      QemuIplParameters qipl;
>>> +    /* reset related properties don't have to be migrated or reset */
>>> +    enum s390_reset reset_type;
>>> +    CPUState *reset_cpu;  
>>
>> Wondering if storing the cpu number would be nicer. Opinions?
>>
> 
> Is there any difference in the number of QOM operations?

Not that it would matter much. Just another VCPU lookup by ID.

> 
> Also, do you need to distinguish between 'specified cpu' and
> 'default/any cpu'? Should be deductible from the reset type, though.
> 

Yes, I deduct that from the reset type.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb