From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
Cc: Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: do not start queues that are not enabled by the guest
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:27:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bcc9d51-a5ff-583a-a76d-e7cf9e19bba3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218183353-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 2019/2/19 上午7:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:49:08PM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:39 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:58:51AM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 5:49 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2019/2/13 下午10:51, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1608226
>>>>>> On startup/link-up in multiqueue configuration the virtio-net
>>>>>> tries to starts all the queues, including those that the guest
>>>>>> will not enable by VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET.
>>>>>> If the guest driver does not allocate queues that it will not
>>>>>> use (for example, Windows driver does not) and number of actually
>>>>>> used queues is less that maximal number supported by the device,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a requirement of e.g NDIS? If not, could we simply allocate all
>>>>> queues in this case. This is usually what normal Linux driver did.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> this causes vhost_net_start to fail and actually disables vhost
>>>>>> for all the queues, reducing the performance.
>>>>>> Current commit fixes this: initially only first queue is started,
>>>>>> upon VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET started all the queues
>>>>>> requested by the guest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> hw/net/virtio-net.c | 7 +++++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>>>>> index 3f319ef723..d3b1ac6d3a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>>>>> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>>>>> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void virtio_net_vhost_status(VirtIONet *n, uint8_t status)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(n);
>>>>>> NetClientState *nc = qemu_get_queue(n->nic);
>>>>>> - int queues = n->multiqueue ? n->max_queues : 1;
>>>>>> + int queues = n->multiqueue ? n->curr_queues : 1;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (!get_vhost_net(nc->peer)) {
>>>>>> return;
>>>>>> @@ -1016,9 +1016,12 @@ static int virtio_net_handle_mq(VirtIONet *n, uint8_t cmd,
>>>>>> return VIRTIO_NET_ERR;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - n->curr_queues = queues;
>>>>>> /* stop the backend before changing the number of queues to avoid handling a
>>>>>> * disabled queue */
>>>>>> + virtio_net_set_status(vdev, 0);
>>>>>
>>>>> Any reason for doing this?
>>>> I think there are 2 reasons:
>>>> 1. The spec does not require guest SW to allocate unused queues.
>>>> 2. We spend guest's physical memory to just make vhost happy when it
>>>> touches queues that it should not use.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yuri Benditovich
>>> The spec also says:
>>> queue_enable The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing requests from this
>>> virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled.
>>>
>>> While this is not a conformance clause this strongly implies that
>>> queues which are not enabled are never accessed by device.
>>>
>>> Yuri I am guessing you are not enabling these unused queues right?
>> Of course, we (Windows driver) do not.
>> The code of virtio-net passes max_queues to vhost and this causes
>> vhost to try accessing all the queues, fail on unused ones and finally
>> leave vhost disabled at all.
>
> Jason, at least for 1.0 accessing disabled queues looks like a spec
> violation. What do you think?
Yes, but there's some issues:
- How to detect a disabled queue for 0.9x device? Looks like there's no
way according to the spec, so device must assume all queues was enabled.
- For 1.0, if we depends on queue_enable, we should implement the
callback for vhost I think. Otherwise it's still buggy.
So it looks tricky to enable and disable queues through set status
Thanks
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + n->curr_queues = queues;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> virtio_net_set_status(vdev, vdev->status);
>>>>>> virtio_net_set_queues(n);
>>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: do not start queues that are not enabled by the guest Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 3:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-18 9:58 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 16:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 20:49 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 23:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 6:27 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-02-19 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-20 10:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-21 6:00 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-21 6:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-21 8:18 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-21 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-22 1:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 3:04 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-22 3:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 4:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-25 7:47 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-25 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-28 14:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bcc9d51-a5ff-583a-a76d-e7cf9e19bba3@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yan@daynix.com \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).