From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/core/qdev: Do not allow hot-plugging without hotplug controller
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:33:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c522b57-9908-8c9f-09fd-24b49f0a8b0b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170926134139.GM21016@localhost.localdomain>
On 26.09.2017 15:41, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:05:47PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 21.09.2017 19:56, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:22:42AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> qdev_unplug() bails out with an assertion if the user tries to device_del
>>>> a hot-plugged device that does not have a hotplug controller. Unfortunately,
>>>> our devices are all marked with hotpluggable = true by default (see the
>>>> device_class_init() function in qdev.c), so it currently can happen that
>>>> the user runs into this situation and QEMU gets terminated unexpectedly:
>>>>
>>>> $ qemu-system-aarch64 -M virt -nographic -nodefaults -monitor stdio -S
>>>> QEMU 2.10.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
>>>> (qemu) device_add aux-to-i2c-bridge,id=x
>>>> (qemu) device_del x
>>>> **
>>>> ERROR:qdev-monitor.c:872:qdev_unplug: assertion failed: (hotplug_ctrl)
>>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>>
>>>> Hotplugging devices without a hotplug controller does not make much sense,
>>>> so we should disallow this during the device_add process already!
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> I'm queueing this on machine-next. We still want it even if we
>>> apply the patch that changes TYPE_DEVICE to hotpluggable=false by
>>> default, right?
>>
>> OK, just to be sure: Please de-queue it again. As you already mentioned
>> in another mail, there are situations where this does not work (e.g.
>> when one hot-pluggable device wants to instantiate another hot-pluggable
>> device internally).
>
> I just dequeued it.
>
>>
>> But maybe we could add the test for the availability of a hot-plug
>> controller to qmp_device_add() instead? (I haven't had a closer look at
>> that yet, though).
>
> I'm unsure about this. Now we know we have some devices that
> work without a hotplug controller, so what's the reason
> device_add must always require one?
The problem is that you can also "device_del" these devices again. And
qdev_unplug() currently has this piece of code in it:
/* hotpluggable device MUST have HotplugHandler, if it doesn't
* then something is very wrong with it */
g_assert(hotplug_ctrl);
So if you do a device_add followed by a device_del with one of these
devices, QEMU aborts and kills your guest.
One solution is maybe to remove the assert here. OTOH, considering that
we have the assert in qdev_monitor.c->qdev_unplug(), adding a check for
the availability of a hotplug_ctrl in qdev_monitor.c->qmp_device_add()
currently sounds like the better solution to this problem to me. Anybody
got another opinion here? If not, I'll have a try and send a patch...
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-26 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-07 9:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/core/qdev: Do not allow hot-plugging without hotplug controller Thomas Huth
2017-09-11 12:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-11 14:31 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-11 15:06 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-12 18:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-13 7:12 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-13 10:58 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-21 17:56 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-21 18:37 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-26 10:05 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-26 13:41 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-26 14:33 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c522b57-9908-8c9f-09fd-24b49f0a8b0b@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).