qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier: remove AioContext lock
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 11:01:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c910e80-dfdd-da1c-9683-3d7db51467c4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsRGpb02psGIffrw@stefanha-x1.localdomain>



Am 05/07/2022 um 16:11 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:37:20AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> @@ -146,7 +147,6 @@ int virtio_scsi_dataplane_start(VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>  
>>      s->dataplane_starting = false;
>>      s->dataplane_started = true;
>> -    aio_context_release(s->ctx);
>>      return 0;
> 
> This looks risky because s->dataplane_started is accessed by IO code and
> there is a race condition here. Maybe you can refactor the code along
> the lines of virtio-blk to avoid the race.
> 

Uhmm could you explain why is virtio-blk also safe here?
And what is currently protecting dataplane_started (in both blk and
scsi, as I don't see any other AioContext lock taken)?

Because I see that for example virtio_blk_req_complete is IO_CODE, so it
could theoretically read dataplane_started while it is being changed in
dataplane_stop? Even though I guess it doesn't because we disable and
clean the host notifier before modifying it?

But if so, I don't get what is the difference with scsi code, and why we
need to protect only that instance with the aiocontext lock?

Thank you,
Emanuele



  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-08  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09 14:37 [PATCH 0/8] virtio-blk: removal of AioContext lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier: remove " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:11   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08  9:01     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2022-07-12 12:47       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] block-backend: enable_write_cache should be atomic Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:16   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] virtio_blk_process_queued_requests: always run in a bh Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:23   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08  9:07     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-12 12:18       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] virtio: categorize callbacks in GS Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-06-16 16:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-05 14:25   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] virtio-blk: mark GLOBAL_STATE_CODE functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:27   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] virtio-blk: mark IO_CODE functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:39   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08  9:19     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-12 12:26       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] VirtIOBlock: protect rq with its own lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08  9:33     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-08 11:22       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-12 12:34         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-12 12:29       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] virtio-blk: remove unnecessary AioContext lock from function already safe Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:48   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-08 21:19 [PATCH 0/8] virtio-blk: remove AioContext lock Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-08 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier: " Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-11 12:17   ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c910e80-dfdd-da1c-9683-3d7db51467c4@redhat.com \
    --to=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).