From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier: remove AioContext lock
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 11:01:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c910e80-dfdd-da1c-9683-3d7db51467c4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsRGpb02psGIffrw@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Am 05/07/2022 um 16:11 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:37:20AM -0400, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> @@ -146,7 +147,6 @@ int virtio_scsi_dataplane_start(VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>
>> s->dataplane_starting = false;
>> s->dataplane_started = true;
>> - aio_context_release(s->ctx);
>> return 0;
>
> This looks risky because s->dataplane_started is accessed by IO code and
> there is a race condition here. Maybe you can refactor the code along
> the lines of virtio-blk to avoid the race.
>
Uhmm could you explain why is virtio-blk also safe here?
And what is currently protecting dataplane_started (in both blk and
scsi, as I don't see any other AioContext lock taken)?
Because I see that for example virtio_blk_req_complete is IO_CODE, so it
could theoretically read dataplane_started while it is being changed in
dataplane_stop? Even though I guess it doesn't because we disable and
clean the host notifier before modifying it?
But if so, I don't get what is the difference with scsi code, and why we
need to protect only that instance with the aiocontext lock?
Thank you,
Emanuele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-08 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 14:37 [PATCH 0/8] virtio-blk: removal of AioContext lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier: remove " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08 9:01 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2022-07-12 12:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] block-backend: enable_write_cache should be atomic Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] virtio_blk_process_queued_requests: always run in a bh Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08 9:07 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-12 12:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] virtio: categorize callbacks in GS Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-06-16 16:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-05 14:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] virtio-blk: mark GLOBAL_STATE_CODE functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] virtio-blk: mark IO_CODE functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08 9:19 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-12 12:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] VirtIOBlock: protect rq with its own lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-08 9:33 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-08 11:22 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-12 12:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-07-12 12:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-06-09 14:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] virtio-blk: remove unnecessary AioContext lock from function already safe Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-07-05 14:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-08 21:19 [PATCH 0/8] virtio-blk: remove AioContext lock Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-08 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier: " Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-11 12:17 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c910e80-dfdd-da1c-9683-3d7db51467c4@redhat.com \
--to=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).