From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4BAC433E0 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8F52073E for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 09:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NNizPxSS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7A8F52073E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34870 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrHxa-0002nz-OP for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:26:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrHlr-0003Cv-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:14:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:48026 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jrHlp-0006NZ-K4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:14:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1593767648; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=9/QTcXneXiEUPtNHp670XLHgPofW+AHgW9V1cyqokw0=; b=NNizPxSSZoWNdCUH67ZTyWR+lqi9TtAiVw0UMdGnJLpuX4REBru9yXPYSnbVtpTyeBNSvS /3aP3yRx9Ld7xJH0sH34qu+gOmKVRR4LXQYnjjRcaIhq4IXBKh/RkGmM9/q42bn8WyKwa3 c2kJCX4TSPgVwvcK+soHM7hu3DYD/J0= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-259-Qb06cCozOfSuZDNZUYtbDg-1; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:14:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Qb06cCozOfSuZDNZUYtbDg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id q20so24638005wme.3 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:14:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9/QTcXneXiEUPtNHp670XLHgPofW+AHgW9V1cyqokw0=; b=e2wBNP5HFSihNx/9j1igDXXLSbZAvm7uMDBi6Y/R0ztGL33eSRFbXXdfAhXJgA5AZt +PaJyrB7rT3viDzbE4h39+H36B9eT0yzhVayNpqw4H1MtcWTAVvCqWoMAyuXIWifIGug GhQ+D5//7lcSVdytCYJES80EsgYq4e+p819hnuyzy3sxBz3AB6OzMSUUDuu1sCpLwsSm Ogkd8hY6IWFbOFxW523WC4ol+7b2Fwjfw7H3hTYQ1nr9jIH6ZO9pPfb8GHDmUhpr3fVy tBI6gr4WMSoJ6t5jkyssS1hVu1MeH3S5yaSNnuPa8W5eBNJuLFEHSZuVdfcHlIOgBhwW mHfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qj3PR7S5vyqc6QHUXgU2pkECMkul5WeN6TngslvP6IorOYFDp rHqjTNwCc4X9YAi1IFtcCghGUiCZiIXexeYLFoU8C61F2yqsVwxNN9jomVrVKnta5nQ8JOFnXHw zgsKVALBPG/xFOjM= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4707:: with SMTP id y7mr13227681wrq.261.1593767643806; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:14:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqFAdxpBMLVJdi3tw2hbsxA5hEhQW+9MhbbeAzJJKLgY9XfGEI09xw2X0KpGreOawsO8ZtHw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4707:: with SMTP id y7mr13227661wrq.261.1593767643595; Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.39] (1.red-83-51-162.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.51.162.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g195sm13269144wme.38.2020.07.03.02.14.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] hw/block/nvme: reject invalid nsid values in active namespace id list To: Klaus Jensen References: <20200703063420.2241014-1-its@irrelevant.dk> <20200703063420.2241014-16-its@irrelevant.dk> <6a038075-13fd-2f60-23a2-ddc7081cff32@redhat.com> <20200703083701.sj4xlgyzp6xte4xi@apples.localdomain> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Autocrypt: addr=philmd@redhat.com; keydata= mQINBDXML8YBEADXCtUkDBKQvNsQA7sDpw6YLE/1tKHwm24A1au9Hfy/OFmkpzo+MD+dYc+7 bvnqWAeGweq2SDq8zbzFZ1gJBd6+e5v1a/UrTxvwBk51yEkadrpRbi+r2bDpTJwXc/uEtYAB GvsTZMtiQVA4kRID1KCdgLa3zztPLCj5H1VZhqZsiGvXa/nMIlhvacRXdbgllPPJ72cLUkXf z1Zu4AkEKpccZaJspmLWGSzGu6UTZ7UfVeR2Hcc2KI9oZB1qthmZ1+PZyGZ/Dy+z+zklC0xl XIpQPmnfy9+/1hj1LzJ+pe3HzEodtlVA+rdttSvA6nmHKIt8Ul6b/h1DFTmUT1lN1WbAGxmg CH1O26cz5nTrzdjoqC/b8PpZiT0kO5MKKgiu5S4PRIxW2+RA4H9nq7nztNZ1Y39bDpzwE5Sp bDHzd5owmLxMLZAINtCtQuRbSOcMjZlg4zohA9TQP9krGIk+qTR+H4CV22sWldSkVtsoTaA2 qNeSJhfHQY0TyQvFbqRsSNIe2gTDzzEQ8itsmdHHE/yzhcCVvlUzXhAT6pIN0OT+cdsTTfif MIcDboys92auTuJ7U+4jWF1+WUaJ8gDL69ThAsu7mGDBbm80P3vvUZ4fQM14NkxOnuGRrJxO qjWNJ2ZUxgyHAh5TCxMLKWZoL5hpnvx3dF3Ti9HW2dsUUWICSQARAQABtDJQaGlsaXBwZSBN YXRoaWV1LURhdWTDqSAoUGhpbCkgPHBoaWxtZEByZWRoYXQuY29tPokCVQQTAQgAPwIbDwYL CQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQSJweePYB7obIZ0lcuio/1u3q3A3gUCXsfWwAUJ KtymWgAKCRCio/1u3q3A3ircD/9Vjh3aFNJ3uF3hddeoFg1H038wZr/xi8/rX27M1Vj2j9VH 0B8Olp4KUQw/hyO6kUxqkoojmzRpmzvlpZ0cUiZJo2bQIWnvScyHxFCv33kHe+YEIqoJlaQc JfKYlbCoubz+02E2A6bFD9+BvCY0LBbEj5POwyKGiDMjHKCGuzSuDRbCn0Mz4kCa7nFMF5Jv piC+JemRdiBd6102ThqgIsyGEBXuf1sy0QIVyXgaqr9O2b/0VoXpQId7yY7OJuYYxs7kQoXI 6WzSMpmuXGkmfxOgbc/L6YbzB0JOriX0iRClxu4dEUg8Bs2pNnr6huY2Ft+qb41RzCJvvMyu gS32LfN0bTZ6Qm2A8ayMtUQgnwZDSO23OKgQWZVglGliY3ezHZ6lVwC24Vjkmq/2yBSLakZE 6DZUjZzCW1nvtRK05ebyK6tofRsx8xB8pL/kcBb9nCuh70aLR+5cmE41X4O+MVJbwfP5s/RW 9BFSL3qgXuXso/3XuWTQjJJGgKhB6xXjMmb1J4q/h5IuVV4juv1Fem9sfmyrh+Wi5V1IzKI7 RPJ3KVb937eBgSENk53P0gUorwzUcO+ASEo3Z1cBKkJSPigDbeEjVfXQMzNt0oDRzpQqH2vp apo2jHnidWt8BsckuWZpxcZ9+/9obQ55DyVQHGiTN39hkETy3Emdnz1JVHTU0Q== Message-ID: <3d45ddb7-867e-3c40-c78b-cf5bc095e2e0@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 11:14:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200703083701.sj4xlgyzp6xte4xi@apples.localdomain> Content-Language: en-US Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/03 02:53:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Dmitry Fomichev , Klaus Jensen , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Keith Busch , Javier Gonzalez , Maxim Levitsky Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 7/3/20 10:37 AM, Klaus Jensen wrote: > On Jul 3 10:20, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> On 7/3/20 8:34 AM, Klaus Jensen wrote: >>> From: Klaus Jensen >>> >>> Reject the nsid broadcast value (0xffffffff) and 0xfffffffe in the >>> Active Namespace ID list. >> >> Can we have a definition instead of this 0xfffffffe magic value please? >> > > Hmm, not really actually. It's not a magic value, its just because the > logic in Active Namespace ID list would require that it should report > any namespaces with ids *higher* than the one specified, so since > 0xffffffff (NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) is invalid, NVME_NSID_BROADCAST - 1 > needs to be as well. OK. > > What do you say I change it to `min_nsid >= NVME_NSID_BROADCAST - 1`? > The original condition just reads well if you are sitting with the spec > on the side. IMO this is clearer: if (min_nsid + 1 >= NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) { return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR; } Whichever form you prefer you can amend to the respin patch: Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen >>> --- >>> hw/block/nvme.c | 4 ++++ >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c >>> index 65c2fa3ac1f4..0dac7a41ddae 100644 >>> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c >>> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c >>> @@ -956,6 +956,10 @@ static uint16_t nvme_identify_nslist(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeIdentify *c) >>> >>> trace_pci_nvme_identify_nslist(min_nsid); >>> >>> + if (min_nsid == 0xfffffffe || min_nsid == NVME_NSID_BROADCAST) { >>> + return NVME_INVALID_NSID | NVME_DNR; >>> + } >>> + >>> list = g_malloc0(data_len); >>> for (i = 0; i < n->num_namespaces; i++) { >>> if (i < min_nsid) { >>> >> >