* [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl @ 2024-10-25 17:58 Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Pierrick Bouvier ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-25 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini, Pierrick Bouvier Most of the details are available in first patch. Second one is there to ensure we'll have a useful error message if start_exclusive is called from cpu_exec again. I'm a bit puzzled that we never triggered this hang before. Is there something wrong with the potential slow path for ptw_setl, or is it simply very uncommon? v2: - get current cpu from local variable instead of current_cpu global var. - change condition to check cpu is running as current_cpu will never be NULL. Pierrick Bouvier (2): target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec cpu-common.c | 3 +++ target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) -- 2.39.5 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl 2024-10-25 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-25 17:58 ` Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-29 15:47 ` Richard Henderson 2024-11-17 3:49 ` Michael Tokarev 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec Pierrick Bouvier ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-25 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini, Pierrick Bouvier When instrumenting memory accesses for plugin, we force memory accesses to use the slow path for mmu [1]. This create a situation where we end up calling ptw_setl_slow. This was fixed recently in [2] but the issue still could appear out of plugins use case. Since this function gets called during a cpu_exec, start_exclusive then hangs. This exclusive section was introduced initially for security reasons [3]. I suspect this code path was never triggered, because ptw_setl_slow would always be called transitively from cpu_exec, resulting in a hang. [1] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/6d03226b42247b68ab2f0b3663e0f624335a4055 [2] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/115ade42d50144c15b74368d32dc734ea277d853 [3] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/279 Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2566 Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> --- target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c index da187c8792a..ddc51e3e0b8 100644 --- a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ static bool ptw_setl_slow(const PTETranslate *in, uint32_t old, uint32_t new) { uint32_t cmp; + CPUState *cpu = env_cpu(in->env); + /* We are in cpu_exec, and start_exclusive can't be called directly.*/ + g_assert(cpu->running); + cpu_exec_end(cpu); /* Does x86 really perform a rmw cycle on mmio for ptw? */ start_exclusive(); cmp = cpu_ldl_mmuidx_ra(in->env, in->gaddr, in->ptw_idx, 0); @@ -114,6 +118,7 @@ static bool ptw_setl_slow(const PTETranslate *in, uint32_t old, uint32_t new) cpu_stl_mmuidx_ra(in->env, in->gaddr, new, in->ptw_idx, 0); } end_exclusive(); + cpu_exec_start(cpu); return cmp == old; } -- 2.39.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-29 15:47 ` Richard Henderson 2024-11-17 3:49 ` Michael Tokarev 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Richard Henderson @ 2024-10-29 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel; +Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Paolo Bonzini On 10/25/24 18:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > When instrumenting memory accesses for plugin, we force memory accesses > to use the slow path for mmu [1]. This create a situation where we end > up calling ptw_setl_slow. This was fixed recently in [2] but the issue > still could appear out of plugins use case. > > Since this function gets called during a cpu_exec, start_exclusive then > hangs. This exclusive section was introduced initially for security > reasons [3]. > > I suspect this code path was never triggered, because ptw_setl_slow > would always be called transitively from cpu_exec, resulting in a hang. > > [1]https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/6d03226b42247b68ab2f0b3663e0f624335a4055 > [2]https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/115ade42d50144c15b74368d32dc734ea277d853 > [3]https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/279 > > Fixes:https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2566 > Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier<pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > --- > target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-29 15:47 ` Richard Henderson @ 2024-11-17 3:49 ` Michael Tokarev 2024-11-18 2:54 ` Pierrick Bouvier 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Michael Tokarev @ 2024-11-17 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini 25.10.2024 20:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > When instrumenting memory accesses for plugin, we force memory accesses > to use the slow path for mmu [1]. This create a situation where we end > up calling ptw_setl_slow. This was fixed recently in [2] but the issue > still could appear out of plugins use case. > > Since this function gets called during a cpu_exec, start_exclusive then > hangs. This exclusive section was introduced initially for security > reasons [3]. > > I suspect this code path was never triggered, because ptw_setl_slow > would always be called transitively from cpu_exec, resulting in a hang. > > [1] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/6d03226b42247b68ab2f0b3663e0f624335a4055 > [2] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/115ade42d50144c15b74368d32dc734ea277d853 > [3] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/279 > > Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2566 > Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> [1] is in 8.2.x. [2] is in 9.2.tobe, and marked as should be picked up for stable (I picked it up for 8.2.x, 9.0.x and 9.1.x). Shouldn't this one be picked up for stable too, as an addition fix ontop of [2]? Or is it not important? (I guess since it's reported in our issue tracker, it is problematic for someone already). I picked this one up for 8.2, 9.0 and 9.1 stable series -- please let me know if I should not. Also, what about the 2/2 in this series, "cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec", which is 779f30a01af8566780cefc8639505b758950afb3 in master now? Thanks, /mjt > target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c > index da187c8792a..ddc51e3e0b8 100644 > --- a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c > +++ b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c > @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ static bool ptw_setl_slow(const PTETranslate *in, uint32_t old, uint32_t new) > { > uint32_t cmp; > > + CPUState *cpu = env_cpu(in->env); > + /* We are in cpu_exec, and start_exclusive can't be called directly.*/ > + g_assert(cpu->running); > + cpu_exec_end(cpu); > /* Does x86 really perform a rmw cycle on mmio for ptw? */ > start_exclusive(); > cmp = cpu_ldl_mmuidx_ra(in->env, in->gaddr, in->ptw_idx, 0); > @@ -114,6 +118,7 @@ static bool ptw_setl_slow(const PTETranslate *in, uint32_t old, uint32_t new) > cpu_stl_mmuidx_ra(in->env, in->gaddr, new, in->ptw_idx, 0); > } > end_exclusive(); > + cpu_exec_start(cpu); > return cmp == old; > } > -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1 61AD 3D98 ECDF 2C8E Old key: rsa2048/457CE0A0804465C5 6EE1 95D1 886E 8FFB 810D 4324 457C E0A0 8044 65C5 Transition statement: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/gpg-transition-2024.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl 2024-11-17 3:49 ` Michael Tokarev @ 2024-11-18 2:54 ` Pierrick Bouvier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-11-18 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Tokarev, qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini Hi Michael, On 11/16/24 19:49, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 25.10.2024 20:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: >> When instrumenting memory accesses for plugin, we force memory accesses >> to use the slow path for mmu [1]. This create a situation where we end >> up calling ptw_setl_slow. This was fixed recently in [2] but the issue >> still could appear out of plugins use case. >> >> Since this function gets called during a cpu_exec, start_exclusive then >> hangs. This exclusive section was introduced initially for security >> reasons [3]. >> >> I suspect this code path was never triggered, because ptw_setl_slow >> would always be called transitively from cpu_exec, resulting in a hang. >> >> [1] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/6d03226b42247b68ab2f0b3663e0f624335a4055 >> [2] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/115ade42d50144c15b74368d32dc734ea277d853 >> [3] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/279 >> >> Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2566 >> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > > [1] is in 8.2.x. [2] is in 9.2.tobe, and marked as should be picked up > for stable (I picked it up for 8.2.x, 9.0.x and 9.1.x). > > Shouldn't this one be picked up for stable too, as an addition fix > ontop of [2]? Or is it not important? (I guess since it's reported > in our issue tracker, it is problematic for someone already). > > I picked this one up for 8.2, 9.0 and 9.1 stable series -- please > let me know if I should not. > You can safely integrate this on all stable branches. It will fix the issue with plugins, and might possibly fix an issue with the memory access if someone hit that path. The original problematic change was missing this fix from the start. > Also, what about the 2/2 in this series, "cpu: ensure we don't call > start_exclusive from cpu_exec", which is 779f30a01af8566780cefc8639505b758950afb3 > in master now? > It's an assert to ensure we don't hit the same blocking situation in the future (with new changes), so I don't think there is an added value to integrate that on stable branches. Thanks, Pierrick > Thanks, > > /mjt > >> target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c >> index da187c8792a..ddc51e3e0b8 100644 >> --- a/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c >> +++ b/target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c >> @@ -107,6 +107,10 @@ static bool ptw_setl_slow(const PTETranslate *in, uint32_t old, uint32_t new) >> { >> uint32_t cmp; >> >> + CPUState *cpu = env_cpu(in->env); >> + /* We are in cpu_exec, and start_exclusive can't be called directly.*/ >> + g_assert(cpu->running); >> + cpu_exec_end(cpu); >> /* Does x86 really perform a rmw cycle on mmio for ptw? */ >> start_exclusive(); >> cmp = cpu_ldl_mmuidx_ra(in->env, in->gaddr, in->ptw_idx, 0); >> @@ -114,6 +118,7 @@ static bool ptw_setl_slow(const PTETranslate *in, uint32_t old, uint32_t new) >> cpu_stl_mmuidx_ra(in->env, in->gaddr, new, in->ptw_idx, 0); >> } >> end_exclusive(); >> + cpu_exec_start(cpu); >> return cmp == old; >> } >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec 2024-10-25 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-25 17:58 ` Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-26 4:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2024-11-04 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier 2024-11-12 15:47 ` Richard Henderson 3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-25 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini, Pierrick Bouvier Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> --- cpu-common.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/cpu-common.c b/cpu-common.c index 6b262233a3b..0d607bbe493 100644 --- a/cpu-common.c +++ b/cpu-common.c @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ void start_exclusive(void) CPUState *other_cpu; int running_cpus; + /* Ensure we are not running, or start_exclusive will be blocked. */ + g_assert(!current_cpu->running); + if (current_cpu->exclusive_context_count) { current_cpu->exclusive_context_count++; return; -- 2.39.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-10-26 4:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2024-10-26 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini On 25/10/24 14:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> > --- > cpu-common.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl 2024-10-25 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-11-04 22:25 ` Pierrick Bouvier 2024-11-12 15:47 ` Richard Henderson 3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-11-04 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Richard Henderson, Paolo Bonzini, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Hi, On 10/25/24 10:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > Most of the details are available in first patch. Second one is there to ensure > we'll have a useful error message if start_exclusive is called from cpu_exec > again. > > I'm a bit puzzled that we never triggered this hang before. Is there something > wrong with the potential slow path for ptw_setl, or is it simply very uncommon? > > v2: > - get current cpu from local variable instead of current_cpu global var. > - change condition to check cpu is running as current_cpu will never be NULL. > > Pierrick Bouvier (2): > target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl > cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec > > cpu-common.c | 3 +++ > target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > Gentle ping. Could this series be pulled by someone for 9.2? Thanks, Pierrick ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl 2024-10-25 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-11-04 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier @ 2024-11-12 15:47 ` Richard Henderson 3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Richard Henderson @ 2024-11-12 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierrick Bouvier, qemu-devel; +Cc: Eduardo Habkost, Paolo Bonzini On 10/25/24 10:58, Pierrick Bouvier wrote: > Most of the details are available in first patch. Second one is there to ensure > we'll have a useful error message if start_exclusive is called from cpu_exec > again. > > I'm a bit puzzled that we never triggered this hang before. Is there something > wrong with the potential slow path for ptw_setl, or is it simply very uncommon? > > v2: > - get current cpu from local variable instead of current_cpu global var. > - change condition to check cpu is running as current_cpu will never be NULL. > > Pierrick Bouvier (2): > target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl > cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec > > cpu-common.c | 3 +++ > target/i386/tcg/sysemu/excp_helper.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > Queued, thanks. r~ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-18 2:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-10-25 17:58 [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-29 15:47 ` Richard Henderson 2024-11-17 3:49 ` Michael Tokarev 2024-11-18 2:54 ` Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-25 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cpu: ensure we don't call start_exclusive from cpu_exec Pierrick Bouvier 2024-10-26 4:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2024-11-04 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] target/i386: fix hang when using slow path for ptw_setl Pierrick Bouvier 2024-11-12 15:47 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).