From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KY3wy-0002rv-Kr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:11:32 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KY3ww-0002rL-Kb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:11:31 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55961 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KY3ww-0002rI-E2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:11:30 -0400
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.173]:28657)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <pureza@gmail.com>) id 1KY3wv-0001Jz-Jh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:11:30 -0400
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2426476wfd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3e1533500808261211j7ab766c1w3dd54f2c613d2820@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:11:24 +0100
From: "Luis Pureza" <pureza@student.dei.uc.pt>
Sender: pureza@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Question regarding the instruction counter
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

The set of functions io_readX() and io_writeX() contain the following test:

if (index > (IO_MEM_NOTDIRTY >> IO_MEM_SHIFT) && !can_do_io(env)) {
        cpu_io_recompile(env, retaddr);
}

If I remove the first part of the condition test, index >
(IO_MEM_NOTDIRTY >> IO_MEM_SHIFT) (that excludes non-I/O memory
areas), is it still supposed to work?

Thanks,

Luis Pureza