From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPtB-0001Ai-UZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:52:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPtA-00019c-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:52:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52763 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPtA-00019N-7D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:52:32 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:5303) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KyPt9-0001P9-O1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:52:31 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j5so1223964wah.18 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:52:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3e1533500811070352x2c3430b9k1eab7af8795f163d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:52:25 +0000 From: "Luis Pureza" Sender: pureza@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5636] Run timers from host alarm timer callback In-Reply-To: <49120B5F.5000805@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <49120B5F.5000805@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, This commit caused a noticeable slowdown while using the instruction counting mechanism. I'm testing with the sparc-test image and with --icount auto. Any ideas? Thanks, Lu=EDs Pureza On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wro= te: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Revision: 5636 >> http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=3Drev&root=3Dqemu&revision= =3D5636 >> Author: aliguori >> Date: 2008-11-05 21:04:35 +0000 (Wed, 05 Nov 2008) >> >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> Run timers from host alarm timer callback >> >> This further cleans up the main loop getting it a lot closer to what a >> main >> loop should be. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori >> > > I've tested this with a variety of clocks and guests but this could uncov= er > more bugs like the previous 5s select sleep. If things start slowing dow= n, > please try this changeset first and let me know. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > >